July 7, 2023

Junta Watch: Min Aung Hlaing Orders Budget Cuts to Fuel War Machine; Anger at East Timor Over NUG Invite; and More  

The Irrawaddy

Junta boss Min Aung Hlaing repeatedly instructed his regime’s ministries to tighten their belts at a June 30 cabinet meeting on ‘boosting the national economy’, even though he has spent the largest proportion of national budget on military expenditures to retain his grip on power.

Min Aung Hlaing urged his ministers to reduce expenditure out of ‘love for the motherland’. Both the junta chief and his deputy, Soe Win, often preach economic abstinence at cabinet meetings.

It is not clear how the ministries have managed to reduce their expenditures so that money can be diverted to the junta’s war on civilian and armed opponents. But the US-sanctioned former National League for Democracy (NLD) lawmaker Daw Thet Thet Khine, who serves as regime’s social welfare minister, has cut the state pension by half from 120,000 kyats (around US$ 50) per year to 60,000 kyats.

Launched in 2017-18 under the NLD government, the pension scheme covers elderly citizens aged 85 and above.

Min Aung Hlaing is no doubt cheering Thet Thet Khine for the cut since it harms the initiative launched under the ousted civilian government while also freeing up extra military budget for the regime.

Regime spurned by SE Asian govt

The junta’s foreign ministry summoned East Timor’s chargé d’affaires to Naypyitaw on Wednesday after the fellow Southeast Asian nation invited Myanmar’s civilian National Unity Government to the swearing-in of its new government on July 1.

U Chan Aye, permanent secretary of the junta’s foreign ministry, told the Timorese diplomat that the NUG is a terrorist organization, and invitation to or communication with NUG representatives “abets terrorism and encourages violence in the country, and infringes international agreements related to combating terrorism.”

He called on the East Timor government to refrain from making any form of contact with such ‘terrorist groups’ and their representatives.

Regime anger over the East Timor government’s invitation came as no surprise.

On June 23, director-general Zaw Phyo Win, the son-in-law of former military dictator Than Shwe, signed the condolence book at the East Timor Embassy in Yangon following the demise of the Timorese prime minister’s wife.

But when the new East Timor government was sworn in a week later, a Myanmar regime desperate for diplomatic recognition was spurned and the NUG invited instead. NUG foreign minister Daw Zin Mar Aung attended the swearing-in and met with the president of East Timor, who even accepted a portrait of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi from her.

Defending the indefensible

As the United Nations Human Rights Council convened in Geneva to discuss human rights violations by Myanmar’s military regime, junta-appointed foreign minister Than Swe gave a diplomatic briefing on recent national developments in Yangon on Thursday.

Military graduate Than Swe, who was Myanmar’s ambassador to the US under U Thein Sein’s quasi-civilian government, repeated what he said at Thai-sponsored informal talks held in June, defending the military regime, blaming the People’s Defense Force, and insisting the Myanmar military does not use disproportionate force but strictly follows Vienna Convention rules of engagement.

However, his statement coincided with a junta warplane dropping bombs on a camp for internally displaced people in Kayah State’s Hpruso, its artillery strike in Sagaing Region’s Wetlet Township that left seven civilians dead, and routine arson attacks on villages in the same region’s Khin-U Township. Meantime, the regime also threatened to bomb an independent school in Kachin State’s Hpakant, accusing it of being run by the civilian National Unity Government.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.