April 2, 2022

Russia claims destruction of Ukraine weapons depots

Russian Defense Ministry

Briefing of the Ministry of Defense of Russia (02.04.2022 )

▫️ Subdivisions of the Lugansk People’s Republic are developing an offence on the positions of the Ukrainian 57 motorcycle brigade, blocking the settlement Borovskoye from the east and south. Up to 30 Ukrainian nationalists and five units of armored equipment have been destroyed.

💥 On the day of April 2, high-speed air-base missiles in the areas of Lozovaya and Pavlograd railway stations were destroyed: armored tank equipment, ammunition and fuel tanks aimed to strengthen the group of Ukrainian troops in Donbass is.

💥 The Mirgorod military airport in the Poltava region was also under construction and several Ukrainian combat helicopters and aircraft were discovered on its masked parking lot, as well as storage with fuel and aircraft were destroyed.

💥 As a result of a high-precision blow by the Iskander operative and tactical complex on the defense headquarters in the city of Kharkov, it was confirmed that the destruction of more than 100 nationalists and mercenaries from western countries.

💥During a day of operational and tactical aviation of the Russian CCC, 28 military facilities of Ukraine were defeated. Among them: two warehouses of missile and artillery, as well as 23 areas of military equipment focus Ukrainian Armed Forces .

📊 In total, since the beginning of a special military operation, 125 planes and 88 helicopters have been destroyed, 381 unmanned aircraft, 1888 tanks and other armed vehicles, 205 installations of fire jet systems, 793 field weapons war of artillery and mortar, as well as 1771 units of special military automobile equipment.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.