The crisis of forced displacement has grown dramatically in the 21st century but remains alarmingly absent from global discussion. This initiative seeks to spotlight the issue, emphasizing the importance of International Humanitarian Law in addressing it. Join us as we delve into the root causes, consequences, and possible solutions to advocate for the rights of the forced displaced.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
Gaza, Ukraine, and the Rising Tide of Refugees: Is the Refugee Convention Fit for the 21st Century?
An Aid Program for Countries At The Edge of Chaos
Humanitarian Negligence: Turning A Blind Eye to The Forced Migration Catastrophe
Closing the Impunity Gap for War Crimes in Ukraine
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
I must leave my home or I must die. This is reality for 117.3 million people, as of 2023’s end – a number over three times the size of California’s population. War, violence, climate change and political/social persecution have no regard for where lives are planted and grown. Peace treaties may be reached, bombs may quiet, dictators may be dethroned, but the displaced live on in a world that seemingly has no place for them. As conflicts fracture communities and countries alike, their numbers only continue to grow.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees outlines forced displacement trends in a report that implores the international community to mobilize. The past three years have presented a doubling of the average annual number of those fleeing conflict. Naturally, it is clear that this is a result of intensified global hostilities. From Sudan to Gaza, violence in the past year has brought death to over 150,000, and displacement to nearly 40 million.
Where is home for the displaced? Violence between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces has stripped over 6 million Sudanese people of stability and security. In addition to the 6 million who have fled to other areas of Sudan, 1.5 million have left their home country altogether. This conflict is affecting not only those who call Sudan home, but those who call it refuge. One million refugees from South Sudan and Eritrea, among others, are now displaced within their nation of asylum. Expulsion by bloodshed has become the only constant for those who, by chance, have become pawns to political violence.
2 million people and 141 square feet of land. Gaza is approximately the same size as Philadelphia, with around 500,000 more people, as of 2020. Between October and December of 2023, over 75 percent of the Gazan population has been internally displaced – for many, multiple times. Conflict in the Gaza Strip has placed all of its inhabitants in the unforgiving path of acute food insecurity. In such a dense area, with starvation and violence around every corner, leaving home is no guarantee of safety – rather, a continuation of the same horrors.
The violence following a military takeover in February 2021 has internally displaced over 2.6 million citizens of Myanmar since. Another 1.3 million, mostly those of the stateless Rohingya group, have been forced to rely on humanitarian aid in Bangladesh or gamble their lives on the rough sea routes to Indonesia or Malaysia. Nearly 2,000 miles away, 10.9 million Afghans have sought refuge and food either within Afghanistan or neighboring countries.
Conflict and climate disasters have displaced 3.9 millions Somalians within the country. War in Ukraine has uprooted 9.7 million Ukrainians, with one-sixth of the population fleeing the country entirely. Whether caused by internal fighting in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, gang violence in Haiti, or civil war in Syria, forced displacement has changed the lives of millions, yet failed to fully enter the international community’s collective consciousness.
What can global actors do with their awareness, then? For the 42 percent of the displaced who leave their home countries, the UNHCR emphasizes a routes-based approach, which requires more detailed data on asylum routes and the protections needed. Investment and strategy is necessary to support the countries receiving refugees, increase refugees’ capacity for self-reliance, and create stable and sustainable conditions for return.
This year, 1.2 million refugees either returned to their country of origin, became citizens of their host country, or resettled in a third country. However, this cannot be considered a unilateral success. People are either returning home to continued violence or staying in countries with limited available opportunities and services. Thus, it is imperative to stabilize conflict in home countries and increase capacity in host countries. There must also be coordinated humanitarian efforts to safeguard refugees from violence and danger throughout their routes by offering calculated protection services; these must be grounded in data respective to the specific route. Lives cannot be rebuilt anywhere when they are threatened in travel.
Despite the varied circumstances that create displacement, 73 percent of the world’s refugees originate from five countries: Afghanistan, Syria, South Sudan, Ukraine, and Venezuela. Most people seek asylum in neighboring countries, but overall, it is lower-income countries who host the largest refugee communities. Countries that hold most of the world’s wealth only hosted 25 percent of refugees in the past year.
This is clearly a global humanitarian crisis, but in a world divided by state borders, who is responsible for those who live on its margins? Currently, countries are not taking on a level of responsibility proportionate to their capacity. Economic resources are crucial to providing sustainable resources and opportunities to refugees; yet, 80 percent of the global refugee population is hosted by countries that altogether amass less than 20 percent of global income.
Although no one is immune to becoming a victim to war and violence, the refugee crisis does highlight and exacerbate existing vulnerabilities. As previously mentioned, there is an unequal distribution of the nations both producing and receiving internally and externally displaced people. Poverty and structural issues are often a cause and effect of violence, as well as a barrier to capacity building. To the same extent, climate change presents a multi-dimensional challenge to the forcibly displaced. Disasters displace, impoverish, and capitalize upon already-fragile communities.
Humankind and nature alike have destabilized (and destroyed) home for 117.3 million people – as long as war and climate change escalates, this number will inflate. How can the international community push back? Effective responses involve working toward a durable, sustainable solution. Whether the displaced return to their home country/town, repatriate in their host country, or resettle in a third country, these pathways necessitate inter-state cooperation and communication, as well as analysis on individual, community, and national capacity.
Through data and trend surveillance, steps can be taken towards a future where home is a place of safe return.
Summary by Peyton Davis
Global trends report 2023. UNHCR. (n.d.). https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends-report-2023
IOM World Migration Report 2024
IOM World Migration Report 2024
At the end of 2022 there were over 117 million people living in displacement globally, most of them being either refugees, asylum-seekers, internally displaced persons (IDPs) or some combination of all three. By June 2024 that number had exceeded 120 million and with continued exacerbating factors such as war and climate change that number is predicted to reach 216 million by 2050.
All the while global funding by donor nations is slow to keep up with millions of displaced persons’ humanitarian needs. The ongoing reduction of peace around the world only reflects the steady increase in global military spending that encroaches on an annual of 2.5 trillion USD. Since the year 2000 and the publication of the first World Migration Report, the number of refugees and IDPs have risen by 250% and 340% respectively. The total number of IDPs alone has doubled since 2012. As forced displacement is inherently a product of the perpetration of war crimes, those most often carried out by state or non-state military actors, it is by no coincidence that the market for violence and the displacement that it causes are both statistically on the rise.
The United Nations, by way of the International Organization for Migration (IOM) as well as its Department of Economic and Social Affairs, tends to separately compile its relevant migration databases with recognition of the lack of choice associated with involuntary (forced) displacement. Meaning that, despite externally displaced individuals being migrants by definition, typical voluntary processes of emigration and immigration are logged in categories apart from involuntary migration as a result of hostile circumstances. Asylum-seekers, although mostly voluntary in their departure, are recognized as forcibly displaced on account of the instability and oppression perceived by them at home.
Since the previous World Migration Report was published over two years ago, the world has seen the intensification of root causes that lead to displacement and human mobility more broadly. A major component of forced displacement in particular is geopolitical transformation, perhaps the most glaring factor in three recently accelerated conflicts that have shown to disrupt global human security while inspiring varying degrees of humanitarian aid. The three conflicts of interest due to their recency include Ukraine since its invasion by Russia in early 2022 (with 5.7 million Ukraine has become the second-largest origin country of refugees in the world after Syria), Sudan amidst civil war causing unprecedented numbers of displaced, and Gaza since October 7th. Aggravated geopolitical transformations and associated intrastate conflicts have driven-up the number of refugees from Afghanistan, South Sudan and Myanmar as well.
Much of the report is mindful of the COVID-19 pandemic as it too can act as both an impetus for migration as well as a hindrance upon displacement relief and resettlement. Those forcibly displaced have experienced immediate impacts from the pandemic and related lockdowns in terms of a loss of employment, risk of deportation, familial disruptions and an increased risk of infection or death.
In pushing to combat internal displacement in particular the United Nations has gradually increased political focus on the problem and have put forth possible solutions and preventative measures. The year 2019 saw major developments by the Secretary-General to establish a High-level Panel on Internal Displacement which soon authored a report on the matter called an Action Agenda. The panel’s report stipulated 10 recommendations for the prevention of, and effective response to, internal displacement around the globe. It recognizes that state actors as well as the global private sector and civil organizations all must have a hand in solving the issues that IDPs face while also ensuring that those affected are engaged in designing solutions. The durability of those solutions is paramount; for an IDP to be no longer considered displaced there are certain conditions needed for the solution to be longstanding and effective. The IOM works within a durability framework that strives towards a reality in which “IDPs no longer have specific assistance and protection needs that are linked to their displacement and such persons can enjoy their human rights without discrimination resulting from their displacement.” Some criteria of a solution to internal displacement deemed durable include: personal safety, an adequate standard of living, property restoration, access to justice and the reunification of family.
Summary by Daniel Osmeyer
McAuliffe, M. and L.A. Oucho (eds.), 2024. World Migration Report 2024. International Organization for Migration (IOM), Geneva. https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2024
The current displacement crisis in Sudan is the largest of its kind today and perhaps the most overlooked. In just over a year of full-scale civil war 11 million people have been displaced internally and close to 2 million have crossed into neighboring countries and are counted as refugees. Yet despite its massive scale and the effect it has on the broader Eastern Africa and Sahel regions, Sudan’s crisis is plainly overshadowed in Western media by other global crises.
In an effort to shed a much needed light on the situation and to honor Nelson Mandela International Day, the Wilson Center in partnership with Islamic Relief USA, has hosted a panel-style event on July 18 for humanitarian coordinators and program directors to discuss the state of the war, possible relief to the displacement crisis and ways to raise global awareness and action.
Elsadig Elnour, the Islamic Relief Worldwide director to Sudan, spoke on the panel remotely from in-country in what was certainly a highlight of the event. Elnour gave an on-the-ground, extensive and firsthand account of internal displacement and food insecurity. These issues have been exacerbated by an intensified armed conflict and a lack of a substantial international recovery project, according to Elnour, who also calls for serious peace negotiations and a decent relocation effort by a state or NGO to effectively tackle the crisis. He continues to navigate the delivery of aid with his organization from Port Sudan ever since his office in Khartoum, Sudan’s capital, was looted in the first months of the conflict a year ago.
Concerning the role of the United States in the crisis, Cameron Hudson, a Senior Fellow of the Africa Program at CSIS, explained that American engagement with Sudan is at an all time low. He sees this as a trend with other global conflicts that get ignored by the U.S. because they aren’t considered “first order national security concerns” that warrant specialized attention. Sudan, despite being the home of at least 11 million displaced people, the most of any nation on earth, receives no significant support from Washington. And as other speakers note, relief efforts and those displaced seeking refuge are often seriously constricted by logistical and financial impediments like transportation gaps, seasonal weather, bureaucratic processes and airspace restrictions – many of which are reliant on unpredictable shifts in territorial control as a result of the ongoing war.
Associate Director of Airlink’s Humanitarian Programs Bethany Holland spoke of the logistical challenges plaguing relief efforts in Sudan. She contrasted the lack of international relief there to the otherwise fast-paced humanitarian response to Ukraine in the wake of its 2022 invasion.
“The sheer number of people that are in need of humanitarian aid within these areas that have no access to it is unfortunately unique,” Holland said of the unprecedented logistical situation.
Oge Onubogu, director of the Wilson Center’s Africa Program, touched on the politically complex and often violent history of Sudan since it gained independence in 1956. In that time the nation has seen seven successful coups and four major civil wars, one of which coincided with the Darfur genocide between 2003 and 2005. Onubogu and Hudson spoke on the precedents set by the international community and the African Union during previous Sudanese crises in which surrounding countries intervened diplomatically and the U.S. took leadership positions in delivering aid and a concerted peacekeeping effort. Despite precedence in these humanitarian capacities the world has offered little support to the Sudanese people as they face this unprecedented crisis today.
“The international system is not responding in the way that it did previously,” Hudson explained.
And so what needs to be done? All panelists agreed on a redirection of global eyes on Sudan and a rededication by the global community to address the conflict as well as the resulting displacement crisis. Much relies on regional, dedicated cooperation by the African Union and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) in ensuring future unity in Sudan, Elnour agreed. Others reminded listeners of the impact that the current displacement has on neighboring Sahel nations which too need urgent assistance in hosting refugee populations. The panelists’ top priority is the proper access to humanitarian channels for IDPs to receive aid and escape danger; though much more attention and action is needed to create a solution in Sudan.
With expert voices and lived experiences the Wilson Center could offer a glimpse into Sudan’s conflict and the hopeful efforts of the invaluable humanitarians who work tirelessly to help those displaced as a result. And as Nelson Mandela wrote in a 1998 message to the United Nations, “those who live in exile as refugees have for long been sustained by their hope for an end to the conflict and the dawning of a better future.”
Summary by Daniel Osmeyer
Sudan at a crossroads: Addressing the largest internal displacement crisis in the world. Wilson Center. (n.d.). https://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/sudan-crossroads-addressing-largest-internal-displacement-crisis-world