November 5, 2023

Resistance force overruns police station in Kanbalu, Sagaing Region 

Myanmar Now

Resistance fighters are pictured in front of the Chat Thin police station after seizing it on November 2 (Supplied)

The Kanbalu District People’s Defence Force (PDF) attacked and burnt down a junta police station 25 miles north of Kanbalu town on Thursday morning, the resistance group said. 

Battalion 2 of the PDF—which fights under the publicly mandated National Unity Government—targeted the site in Chat Thin village at 4am, seizing it after the 12 policemen inside withdrew following one hour of fighting, according to a statement. 

A PDF member said that he saw the fleeing officers drag away the bodies of two slain members of the police force as they retreated. 

“The armed men ran away from the police station,” he said. “Then Mi-35 [combat helicopters] came up from Kalay Town, so we withdrew.”

Myanmar Now was unable to independently verify any casualties in the clash.

The PDF claimed it was able to seize some weapons and ammunition from the station before destroying it. 

The resistance forces continued their attack, targeting a nearby base of the military-backed Pyu Saw Htee militia, but were outgunned and unable to overtake the location. 

“The Pyu Saw Htee base had strong firepower, so we couldn’t capture it,” the PDF member told Myanmar Now.

Some 60 militiamen and a few Myanmar army soldiers were reportedly stationed at the base. 

Later that morning, the PDF, a local People’s Defence Team, and other area allies jointly attacked two other Pyu Saw Htee camps five miles north of Chat Thin and in Sabai Nanthar village 15 miles east of Kanbalu town. 

While local defence forces have previously been able to capture some Pyu Saw Htee sites in villages such as Chat Thin and Chat Gyi, they were later reclaimed.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.