December 6, 2023

The Myanmar Army Could Actually Collapse—But Are the United States and Other Powers Ready for Such a Scenario?

In recent weeks, the Myanmar armed forces, which have already suffered major losses of territory to ethnic minority armies and the People’s Defense Forces, primarily made up of the majority Burman ethnic group, has faced some of its worst defeats.

In northern and northeastern Myanmar, in the crucial battleground of Shan State, the BBC reports that: “Three ethnic insurgent armies in Shan State, supported by other armed groups opposing the government, have overrun dozens of military posts, and captured border crossings and the roads carrying most of the overland trade with China. It is the most serious setback suffered by the junta since it seized power in February 2021. After two-and-half years of battling the armed uprising it provoked with its disastrous coup, the military is looking weak, and possibly beatable.”

More on:

Myanmar

Southeast Asia

Wars and Conflict

Indeed, the junta forces are doing so terribly that even the military-installed president of Myanmar, which is not a role that encourages an official to speak freely, has warned that the country could collapse into a range of fiefdoms or a total failed state, due to the army’s losses.

Asia Unbound

CFR fellows and other experts assess the latest issues emerging in Asia today. 1-3 times weekly.

https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api2/anchor?ar=1&k=6LdVm2YUAAAAALLTS2XVQD5O47VtNJIKQTsrqP9t&co=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY2ZyLm9yZzo0NDM.&hl=en&type=image&v=cwQvQhsy4_nYdnSDY4u7O5_B&theme=light&size=normal&cb=j8vuwuifusrzEmail Address

View all newsletters >

The military is failing in other ways as well. It is suffering from a rising number of defections according to multiple people who closely follow the rate of defections. Lacking men, the military is resorting to dropping bombs on villages, but such a tactic will never lead it to control territory, and will only further inflame people, possibly leading them to join anti-junta forces. What is more, the Russian planes that the military uses are drying up, as Russia needs its military kit. The junta has begun to look to sources like North Korea for arms, showing its desperation. Other close Myanmar watchers who have followed the military’s finances suggest that it is far closer to bankruptcy than is widely known, and a top general was recently sacked for corruption.

It is also possible that the military will collapse from within. Junior officers are highly dissatisfied with junta leader Min Aung Hlaing’s prosecution of the war, and so another coup—against the top leadership—is not out of the question. Such an action would further divide the military and make it even more vulnerable to collapse.

What’s more, as longtime Myanmar military analyst Anthony Davis notes in Asia Times, were the military to launch a counteroffensive toward the north, they would leave themselves wide open to guerilla attacks from opposition forces. Were the military to retreat from much of the north and just try to protect a few big cities in central Myanmar, including its headquarters in Naypyidaw, it would be a major psychological defeat, suggesting that the supposedly powerful military is now on the run. A counteroffensive also would stretch the military’s ranks even thinner, potentially opening up other parts of the country for the opposition to launch new offensives.

It’s time for outsiders to recognize that the Myanmar military is losing strength fast, and an internal collapse—or further major breakthroughs by the opposition forces—could lead to a situation in which the military disintegrates, as has happened in many other countries. But such a collapse, if not handled properly by both Burmese leaders in the exiled National Unity Government (NUG) and the leading, powerful ethnic militias, could also lead the country to disintegrate into a series of groups, lacking a common enemy, who could easily turn their guns on each other, creating total bloody chaos and completely gutting the remainder of the Myanmar state.

Many U.S. officials still seem convinced that the military could not collapse, and have predicated their thinking about how the conflict will be resolved by assuming that eventually, the military will negotiate some end to the crisis with the coalition of opposition forces. However, there is little reason for the opposition to come to the table if they continue to rack up battlefield victories and the military looks more feeble and internally divided.

Yet there seems to be little planning within the U.S. government for a possible day after the Myanmar military collapses, and how to help the Myanmar people, should such a collapse happen, quickly create a framework for a future, federal and democratic government.

Such planning needs to start now. There will be little time, if the military collapses, in a state that already has been economically devastated and lacks most state services, to broker some path toward a future democratic government, and there are precious few leaders in Myanmar or in the NUG who could foster a compromise to build this path. Aung San Suu Kyi has been in jail during the entire civil conflict and many of her ideas, and her political persona, have been bypassed by a younger cohort in the NUG and other opposition groups.

Read thre full article: https://www.cfr.org/blog/myanmar-army-could-actually-collapse-are-united-states-and-other-powers-ready-such-scenario

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.