December 20, 2023

The NUG and EROs have made important, fundamental consensuses.

Myanmar Now

In a public announcement on December 13, Defence Minister U Yee Mon stated that the National Unity Government (NUG) and the ethnic resistance organizations (EROs) have made important and fundamental understanding, built trust and shared common views among themselves. He added that there always was, and still is, a coordination and communication when strategizing for political or military affairs among revolutionary alliances. The minister said that [the NUG] have met, either virtually or in person, with almost all ERO leaders during the three years of the people’s revolution. He said none of the ethnic groups have thoughts of secession nor conforming to foreign powers but instead have a strong desire to establish a new republic which encompasses the right to self-determination, cooperation for the benefit of all, and the values of freedom. They realize that this can only be achieved by rooting out the military dictatorship, he added.

“One thing that is highly noticeable in such meetings is that all leaders have the Union Spirit,” said the minister.

In addition, the Three Brotherhood Alliance (TBA) announced on December 12 that Operation 1027 succeed-ed in its objectives to attack and drive back the terrorist Military Council’s encampments and its weapon production sites. Even though the aims of each group and the aim of the alliance have been fulfilled to a certain point, we must all push forth through upcoming battles to achieve our collective aims, said the announcement.

TBA also said that none among them will turn back at this juncture nor ignore the political objectives desired by all the people, who have been oppressed for generations at the hands of the military council.

Full statement in Burmese available on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3tjChT8

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.