March 10, 2024

Ukrainian General Staff:  about 900 Russian troops killed or wounded in 24 hours; 46 tanks and APC’s destroyed or disabled

Ukraine Defense Ministry

Operational information as of 10.00 March 10, 2024 on the Russian invasion

Spokesman of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Alexander Shtupun.

Glory to Ukraine! Seventy-hundred forty-sixth era of the large-scale armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine has begun.

During the past day, there were 73 combat clashes.

In total, the enemy carried out 5 missiles and 95 air strikes, carried out 136 shelling from reactive volcano fire systems across our troops and settlements.

On the night of March 10, 2024, the Russian occupiers hit 4 C-300 anti-aircraft guided missiles around Kharkiv and Donetsk region and 39 Shahed Bpla type.

35 attack drones were shot down as a result of combat.

Most targets were destroyed by the forces and means of mobile fire groups of the Defense Forces of Ukraine.

During the past day, the settlements of Graniv, Synkivka of Kharkiv region; Serebryan forestry, Bilogorivka of Luhansk region; Novosadove, Terny, Yampolivka, Mykolaivka, Semenivka, Bogdanivka, Chasiv Yar, Toretsk, Druzhba, Zhelanne, Alexandropil, Novokalinove, Ocheretyne, Novooleksandrivka, Novobakhmutivka, Krasnogorivka, Novomyhajlivka, Maksimilyanivka, Vugledar, Starom Ayor Donetsk region; Robotine, Novodanilivka Zaporizhia region.

More than 110 settlements of Chernihiv, Sumy, Kharkiv, Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia, Dnipropetrovsk, Kherson and Mykolaiv oblasts were under artillery fire.

In the area of responsibility of the OSUV “North” in the Volyn and Polish directions, the operating environment remains without significant changes.

In the northern and slobozhansky directions, the enemy maintains a military presence in the border areas, conducts diversionary activities in order to prevent the transfer of our troops to threatening directions, increases the density of mine-explosive fences along the state border in the Belgorod region.

In the area of responsibility of the osuv “Khortytsia” in the kupâns Оkomu direction the enemy of offensive (stormovih) actions did not lead.

In the Limansky direction, our soldiers repelled 7 attacks of the enemy in the areas of the settlements of Tern and Spirne of Donetsk region.

In the Bakhmut direction, the defense forces repelled 6 attacks of the enemy in the areas of Bogdanivka, Ivanivka, Klishchiyivka and Andriyivka of Donetsk region.

In the area of responsibility of the OSUV “Tavria”, in the Avdiyiv direction, our defenders repelled 16 attacks of the enemy in the areas of the settlements Berdychy, Orlivka, Tonenke, Pervomaiske.

In the Novopavlívs Наkomu direction, the defense forces continue to restrain the enemy in the areas of Krasnogorivka, Georgiyivka, Novomyhajlivka of Donetsk region, where the enemy, supported by aviation, tried to break through the defense of our troops over 30 times.

In the Orihívs хідkomu direction, 8 attacks of the enemy in the areas east of Levadnogo, Robotinogo and western Palm Zaporizhia region.

In the area of responsibility of the OSUV “Odessa” in the Kherson direction, the Defense Forces continue to maintain positions.

Over the past day, the Defense Forces Aviation has struck 8 areas of enemy personnel concentration, weapons and military equipment.

The units of the rocket troops affected the area of the concentration of personnel, the radio-electronic combat station and the occupiers’ anti-aircraft defense.

In general, last day the total losses of Russian zagarbnikív were about 900 people. Also, the enemy lost 19 tanks, 27 combat armored vehicles, 38 artillery systems, three rsvv, 2 weapons of defense, 41 bpla otr, 69 vehicles and 6 special equipment units.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.