March 10, 2009

Piracy Panel

Dr. Martin Murphy, Senior Fellow, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments Captain Samuel M. Neill, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain Gordan Van Hook, U.S. Navy, (Ret.)

Martin Murphy begins by discussing Somali piracy. Somali pirates are a unique group because they have no fear of reprisal, unlike most pirates throughout history who are constantly avoiding capture. Several factors have created this perfect storm: there is no one to enforce domestic law in Somali sea territory, poor security, a rich maritime culture, geographical advantages such as narrow seas, and the opportunity of gain. Thus, Somali pirates are playing a low-risk, high-reward game. Former dictator Beret, who ruled Somalia from 1969 to 1991, left a disaster in his wake by inciting inter-clan violence and collectivizing agriculture. These actions led to ethnic conflict, starvation, and displacement. These conditions of poverty and hostility certainly foster the conditions necessary for piracy to flourish. Political elites benefit from piracy; a former president of Puntland, a semi-autonomous Somali state, earned twenty percent of his income from piracy. In addressing this phenomenon, water-based solutions are often cost-ineffective. It is too difficult to fight piracy on vast, international waters. Instead, piracy must be addressed at the land-based source: those who are gaining wealth and political benefit from piracy. Gordan van Hook emphasizes the need for a cooperative global maritime partnership, as well as more sea and air assets.  

https://bcfausa.org/video/piracy-panel/

 

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.