December 10, 2009

United States-China Relations in the Obama Era

David M. Lampton, Dean of faculty, Director of the China Studies Program, SAIS JHU

David M. Lampton speaks on the important, increasingly prescient yet complicated relationship between the U.S. and China. Between 2000 and 2008, Maryland exports to China increased by 605 percent. Beyond a closer trading relationship with the U.S., China is also taking on a more assertive role in the international sphere. Lampton describes the complex competition-cooperation axis that the U.S. is operating within. On one hand, the U.S. is experiencing insecurities about what China’s rise means for global power distribution. On the other hand, the China-U.S. relationship is an interdependent one, which offers opportunity for both actors. While China, as well as the rest of Asia, is expressing a greater feeling of independence from the West, U.S. citizens are also expressing a desire for the government to prioritize domestic over foreign policy. Despite this, 25 percent of China’s exports are imported by the U.S., and China stimulates the U.S. economy through loans. China-U.S. relations are unique in their equally competitive and collaborative nature, which presents complex policy considerations. 

United States-China Relations in the Obama Era

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.