November 12, 2024

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,925 Ukrainian battle casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

▫️In Kharkov region, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of the 22nd Mechanised Brigade, 57th Motorised Infantry Brigade of the AFU, 103rd and 113th territorial defence brigades near Bochkovo, Udy, Izbitskoye, and Kazachaya Lopan (Kharkov region).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 60 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, and two motor vehicles.

▫️Units of the Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 42nd, 60th, 63rd, 115th mechanised brigades, and 3rd Assault Brigade of the AFU near Nadiya (Lugansk People’s Republic), Kupyansk, Ostrovskoye (Kharkov region), Krasny Liman, Yampolovka, and Torskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Three counter-attacks launched by assault detachments of the 14th Mechanised Brigade of the AFU and 1st National Guard Brigade were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to up to 470 troops, five motor vehicles, one UK-made 155-mm FH-70 howitzer, one U.S.-made 155-mm M198 howitzer, two U.S.-made 105-mm M119 guns, and one 122-mm D-30 howitzer. One Anklav-N electronic warfare station and four field ammunition depots were destroyed.

▫️Units of the Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line and inflicted losses on formations of the 24th, 30th mechanised brigades, 46th Airmobile Brigade, 79th Air Assault Brigade of the AFU, and 124th Territorial Defence Brigade near Slavyansk, Nikolayevka, Predtechino, Dachnoye, and Kurakhovo (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Five counter-attacks launched by assault detachments of the 33rd, 54th mechanised brigades, 77th and 81st airmobile brigades of the AFU were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to up to 765 troops, one armoured personnel carrier, one motor vehicle, and two 122-mm D-30 howitzers. Two electronic warfare stations and two field ammunition depots were destroyed.

▫️Units of the Tsentr Group of Forces continued advancing to the depth of the enemy’s defences and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 100th Mechanised Brigade, 142nd Infantry Brigade, 68th Jaeger Brigade of the AFU, and 116th Territorial Defence Brigade near Dzerzhinsk, Voznesenka, Dyleyevka, and Ukrainka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Eleven counter-attacks launched by assault detachments of the 23rd, 42nd, 154th, 117th mechanised brigades, 152nd Jaeger Brigade of the AFU, 35th Marine Brigade, and Lyut Assault Brigade of the National Police of Ukraine were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to up to 470 troops, one German-made Leopard tank, three motor vehicles, one U.S.-made MaxxPro armoured fighting vehicle, one Kozak armoured fighting vehicle, seven motor vehicles, one 152-mm Msta-B howitzer, one 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system, and two 122-mm D-30 howitzers.

▫️Units of the Vostok Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions and inflicted losses on formations of the 33rd Mechanised Brigade, 128th Mountain Assault Brigade of the AFU, 37th Marine Brigade, and 128th Territorial Defence Brigade near Temirovka (Zaporozhye region), Sukhiye Yaly, Zelenoye Pole, and Rovnopol (Donetsk People’s Republic). 

Four counter-attack of the 123rd Territorial Defence Brigade were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to up to 150 troops, one tank, six motor vehicles, and one 152-mm D-20 gun.

▫️Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 110th Mechanised Brigade of the AFU, 103rd and 126th territorial defence brigades near Novodanilovka (Zaporozhye region), Olgovka, and Nikolskoye (Kherson region).

The AFU losses amounted to up 70 troops and four motor vehicles. One field ammunition depot was destroyed.

▫️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, and Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces delivered strikes at infrastructure of military airfields, power objects ensuring operation of the Ukrainian defence industry, as well as engaged manpower clusters and military hardware in 142 areas.

▫️Air defence units shot down six U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles and 71 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

▫️In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, 648 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 35,622 unmanned aerial vehicles, 585 anti-aircraft missile systems, 19,176 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 1,487 MLRS combat vehicles, 17,723 field artillery guns and mortars, and 28,182 units of support military vehicles have been neutralised.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.