November 26, 2024

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,675 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

▫️In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of the 116th Territorial Defence Brigade and 5th Border Detachment of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine near Lebedevka and Kazachaya Lopan (Kharkov region).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 115 troops, one tank, one motor vehicle, and one 122-mm D-30 howitzer.

▫️As a result of decisive actions, units of the Zapad Group of Forces liberated Kopanki (Kharkov region).

Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of the 43rd, 44th, 67th mechanised brigades, 25th Airborne Brigade of the AFU, and 115th Territorial Defence Brigade near Kupyansk, Senkovo, Lozovaya, Zagoruykovka, Novoplatonovka (Kharkov region), and Ivanovka (Donetsk People’s Republic). 

Five counter-attacks launched by assault detachments of the 115th, 116th mechanised brigades, 3rd Tank Brigade of the AFU, and 119th Territorial Defence Brigade were repelled. The AFU losses amounted to up to 440 troops, one tank, one armoured fighting vehicle, five motor vehicles,and one Polish-made 155-mm Krab self-propelled artillery system. One Anklav-N electronic warfare station and three field ammunition depots were destroyed.

▫️Units of the Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line and inflicted losses on formations of the 23rd, 54th mechanised brigades, and 10th Mountain Assault Brigade of the AFU near Konstantinovka, Dachnoye, and Slavyansk (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Three counter-attacks launched by formations of the 79th Air Assault Brigade and 46th Airmobile Brigade of the AFU were repelled. The AFU losses amounted to up to 485 troops, one armoured personnel carrier, one armoured fighting vehicle, and two motor vehicles. One field ammunition depot was destroyed.

▫️Units of the Tsentr Group of Forces continued advancing to the depth of the enemy’s defences and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 151st Mechanised Brigade, 68th Infantry Brigade of the AFU, 38th Marine Brigade, 14th National Guard Brigade, and 132nd Territorial Defence Brigade near Grodovka, Dachenskoye, Mirolyubovka, Dimitrov, and Pravdovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Nine counter-attacks launched by assault detachments of the 100th, 117th mechanised brigades of the AFU, 35th Marine Brigade, and Lyut Assault Brigade of the National Police of Ukraine were repelled. The AFU losses amounted to more than 450 troops, one tank, five motor vehicles, one 203-mm Pion self-propelled artillery system, one 152-mm Msta-B howitzer, two 152-mm D-20 guns, and two 122-mm D-30 howitzers.

▫️Units of the Vostok Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions and inflicted losses on formations of the 33rd Mechanised Brigade of the AFU, 127th and 241st territorial defence brigades near Razliv, Komar, and Oktyabr (Donetsk People’s Republic).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 125 troops, one tank, six motor vehicles, one 155-mm Bogdana self-propelled artillery system, and one 152-mm Akatsiya self-propelled artillery system.

▫️Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 103rd, 124th, and 126th territorial defence brigades near Olgovka, Molodezhnoye, and Nikolskoye (Kherson region).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 60 troops, two motor vehicles, and one 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system. One Anklav-N electronic warfare station was destroyed.

▫️Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces delivered strikes at infrastructure of military airfields, AFU UAV command posts, from where kamikaze drones were launched at the Zaporozhye NPP, as well as engaged manpower clusters and military hardware of the enemy in 135 areas.

▫️Air defence units shot down six French-made Hammer guided aerial bombs, one U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectile, and 71 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles, including 56 of them outside the special military operation zone.

▫️In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, 649 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 36,719 unmanned aerial vehicles, 586 anti-aircraft missile systems, 19,508 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 1,492 MLRS combat vehicles, 18,562 field artillery guns and mortars, and 28,739 units of support military vehicles have been neutralised.

❗️Over the past 24 hours, Energodar and surrounding areas of the Zaporozhye NPP were shelled five times and attacked three times by copter-type unmanned aerial vehicles. As a result of the provocation, there are no casualties, and one administrative building sustained minor damage. Two unmanned aerial vehicles were destroyed by air defence units, one was suppressed by electronic warfare means. At the moment, the staff of the Zaporozhye NPP continues to work as usual, maintains the NPP’s facilities, and monitors the radioactive situation.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.