April 16, 2025

Myanmar junta bombs monastery as it blames quake for religious devastation

rfa

The junta said a recent earthquake destroyed almost 10,000 religious buildings in the country.

By RFA Burmese

2025.04.14

Social media sharing button
Monasteries damaged by the earthquake in Mandalay. Photo taken on April 7, 2025.
Monasteries damaged by the earthquake in Mandalay. Photo taken on April 7, 2025. (RFA)

Myanmar’s junta bombed a monastery in the country’s northwest on Saturday, killing five people, including children, just one day before it publicly announced that a recent earthquake had destroyed almost 10,000 religious buildings across the country.

The airstrike in Tabayin township, Sagaing region, injured nine others and reduced a monastery to rubble, according to the Tabayin Brotherhood Organization, which supports displaced civilians.

“Around 1 p.m., a military plane opened fire on the monastery outside Kya Khat village,” a member of the organization said, speaking on condition of anonymity due to security risks. “Three child monks, one student and a civilian fleeing conflict were killed.”

Additional junta airstrikes on Sunday in Mindat township, Chin state – now under control of the Chin Brotherhood alliance – destroyed more buildings, including the Myoma Baptist Church, residents said.

The monastery in Kya Khat village, Tabayin Township, Sagaing Region, seen after it was bombed on April 12, 2025.
The monastery in Kya Khat village, Tabayin Township, Sagaing Region, seen after it was bombed on April 12, 2025. (Tabayin Brotherhood Organization)

The attack came amid ongoing clashes and aerial bombardments in Sagaing and Mandalay regions, which have been severely impacted both by conflict and the powerful 7.7 magnitude earthquake that struck on March 28. The disaster has so far claimed more than 3,600 lives and caused widespread structural damage, including the collapse of religious sites.

Yet, while the junta continues to launch airstrikes across the country – including on religious institutions – it released a report through state-run media the following day blaming the earthquake for widespread damage to sacred sites.

According to its figures, almost 10,000 religious buildings were destroyed, including over 5,000 stupas, 3,800 monasteries, 180 nunneries, 130 mosques, 50 churches, 26 Hindu temples and one Chinese temple.

Nearly 160 monks and 55 nuns were reported killed in the quake, with 177 others injured. In Mandalay’s Bone Oe village, three collapsed mosques reportedly killed 140 worshippers.

Despite the devastation, local communities have begun efforts to restore places of worship, though rebuilding requires approval from the very military responsible for much of the destruction.

The military previously announced that international aid groups who wanted to provide assistance to earthquake-hit areas of Myanmar must gain prior approval from junta authorities

“We, along with state authorities, will rebuild the mosque,” said Nay Zaw Aung, chairperson of the Amarapura-based Charity Social Action Association. “All of the earthquake-affected people will be happy that we will continue to actively participate in its reconstruction.”

Myanmar is home to a vast number of religious buildings, reflecting its rich cultural and religious heritage. While precise figures are challenging to calculate due to the country’s ongoing conflicts and limited access to comprehensive data, estimates suggest that there are over 50,000 Buddhist temples, pagodas and monasteries across the country.

In addition to Buddhist sites, Myanmar also hosts numerous Christian churches, mosques, Hindu temples and other places of worship, particularly in regions with diverse ethnic and religious communities, although the exact numbers for these religious buildings are not available.

Translated by Kiana Duncan. Edited by Taejun Kang.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.