April 17, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 230 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 17 April 2025

🪖 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

🔥 In Belgorod direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces engaged formations of two mechanised brigades, one air assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and three territorial defence brigades close to Miropolskoye, Prokhody, Ryasnoye, and Novodmitrovka (Sumy region).

▪️ The AFU losses were up to 65 troops, one tank, three armoured fighting vehicles, two motor vehicles, and six field artillery guns. Two ammunition depots were destroyed.

📍 Units of the Zapad Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Russian troops delivered strikes at manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades and one assault brigade near Yampol (Donetsk People’s Republic), Olgovka, and Borovaya (Kharkov region).

▪️ The AFU losses were up to 240 troops, one tank, three armoured fighting vehicles, five motor vehicles, three field artillery guns, and one Kvertus electronic warfare station. Three enemy ammunition depots were destroyed.

📍 The Yug Group of Forces’ units improved the tactical situation. Russian troops hit clusters of enemy manpower and hardware of four mechanised brigades of the AFU, one territorial defence brigade, and one National Guard brigade near Katerinovka, Poltavka, Seversk, and Yablonovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses were up to 320 troops, five armoured fighting vehicles, seven motor vehicles, and six field artillery guns. Six ammunition depots were neutralised.

🚩 As a result of active actions, units of the Tsentr Group of Forces liberated Preobrazhenka (Donetsk People’s Republic). 

💥 Russian troops launched attacks on formations of three mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, one unmanned aerial defence brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and two National Guard brigades close to Ulyanovka, Uspenovka, Krasnoarmeysk, Novoekonomicheskoye, and Mirolyubovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses were more than 385 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, six motor vehicles, and five field artillery guns

↗️ Units of the Vostok Group of Forces continued advancing into the depth of enemy defences. Russian troops delivered strikesat manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades and one air assault brigade near Karla Marksa, Zelyonoye Pole, Zeleny Kut, and Shevchenko (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses were up to 130 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, two motor vehicles, two field artillery guns, and two electronic warfare stations.

🔥 Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces engaged formations of two mechanised brigades of the AFU and two territorial defence brigades close to Novodanilovka, Kamenskoye (Zaporozhye region), Tomarino, and Nikolskoye (Kherson region).

▪️ The AFU losses were more than 90 troops, nine motor vehicles, one artillery gun, and one electronic warfare station. Three enemy ammunition depots were destroyed.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces engaged the infrastructure of a military airfield, an unmanned aerial vehicle manufacturing enterprise, an uncrewed surface vehicle depot as well as AFU temporary deployment areas and foreign mercenaries in 143 areas.

🎯 Air defence systems shot down five JDAM guided bombs and three HIMARS MLRS projectiles as well as 204 fixed-wing UAVs.

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the AFU losses amounted to:  

▫️ 661 aircraft, 

▫️ 283 helicopters, 

▫️ 52,293 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

▫️ 601 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

▫️ 22,876 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

▫️ 1,536 MLRS combat vehicles, 

▫️ 23,741 field artillery guns and mortars, 

▫️ 34,203 units of special military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.