April 19, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,235 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

 Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 19 April 2025

💥  Last evening, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered a group strike by land- and sea-based precision weaponry and unmanned aerial vehicles at a test site of the Ukrainian Sapsan operational-tactical missile system and Norwegian-made NASAMS air defence systems protecting it.

The goals of the strike were achieved. All the assigned targets have been destroyed.

🔥 In Belgorod direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of three territorial defence brigades near Popovka, Miropolye (Sumy region), and Udy (Kharkov region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 45 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, and one field artillery gun.

📍 Units of the Zapad Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one jaeger brigade of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade near Pogrebnyakovka, Stetskovka, Gorokhovatka, Kupyansk, Sadovod (Kharkov region), Kirovsk, Redkodub (Donetsk People’s Republic), and Novoyegorovka (Lugansk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 265 troops, one tank, four armoured fighting vehicles, including one U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier. Seven motor vehicles, three field artillery guns, one Kvertus electronic warfare station, and two ammunition depots were destroyed.

🚩   As a result of decisive actions, units of the Yug Group of Forces liberated Shevchenko (Donetsk People’s Republic).

💥  Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware concentration areas of one heavy mechanised brigade, three mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, two assault brigades of the AFU, and two territorial defence brigades near Ivanopolye, Grigorovka, Vasyukovka, Zarya, Kleban-Byk, Konstantinovka, and Novoolenovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 365 troops, two tanks, eight armoured fighting vehicles, including one U.S.-made HMMWV armoured fighting vehicle and one M113 armoured personnel carrier. Thirteen motor vehicles, seven field artillery guns, including four NATO-made guns, one U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS launcher, and two ammunition depots were destroyed.

📍 Units of the Tsentr Group of Forces improved the situation along the front line. Losses were inflicted on formations of three mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, one jaeger brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, and two national guard brigades near Dimitrov, Grodovka, Lysovka, Bogdanovka, Krasnoarmeysk, and Mirolyubovka (Donetsk People’s Republic). 

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 350 troops, six armoured fighting vehicles, including one U.S.-made HMMWV armoured fighting vehicle and one M113 armoured personnel carrier, one German-made Marder infantry fighting vehicle, and one French-made VAB armoured personnel carrier. Five motor vehicles, two field artillery guns, and one U.S.-made AN/TPQ-48 counter-battery radar were destroyed.

↗️  Units of the Vostok Group of Forces continued advancing into the depth of enemy defences. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one jaeger brigade of the AFU, and two territorial defence brigades near Zelenoye Pole, Bogatyr, Novopol (Donetsk People’s Republic), Chervonoye, and Gulay Pole (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 130 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, five motor vehicles, and two artillery guns.

🔥 Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of two coastal defence brigades of the AFU and two territorial defence brigades near Olgovka, Antonovka, Nikolskoye, and Dneprovskoye (Kherson region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 80 troops, one Turkish-made Kirpi armoured fighting vehicle, five motor vehicles, three field artillery guns, two electronic warfare stations, and one ammunition depot.

✈️  Operational-Tactical Aviation, strike unmanned aerial vehicles, and Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces struck ammunition and materiel depots of the AFU, as well as engaged temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations in 142 areas.

🎯  Air defence units shot down six U.S.-made JDAM guided aerial bombs and three HIMARS MLRS projectiles as well as 151 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊  In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the AFU losses amounted to:  

▫️ 661 aircraft,

▫️ 283 helicopters,

▫️ 52,743 unmanned aerial vehicles,

▫️ 604 anti-aircraft missile systems,

▫️ 22,947 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles,

▫️ 1,542 MLRS combat vehicles,

▫️ 23,874 field artillery guns and mortars,

▫️ 34,352 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.