July 3, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,305 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 3 July 2025

πŸͺ– The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

πŸ“Units of the Sever Group of Forces improved the situation on the front line in Sumy region. Strikes were delivered at manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade, one air assault brigade, three assault regiments of the AFU, and three territorial defence brigades close to Bessalovka, Kondratovka, Alekseyevka, Sadki, Yunakovka, and Andreyevka (Sumy region).

 In Kharkov direction, Melovoye (Kharkov region) has been liberated as a result of decisive actions.

πŸ’₯ The Group’s units inflicted losses on formations of one motorised infantry brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade near Okhrimovka, Volchanskiye Khutora, and Volchansk (Kharkov region).

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to over 240 troops, three motor vehicles, five field artillery guns, and one materiel depot.

πŸ’₯ The Zapad Group’s units inflicted fire damage on formations of two mechanised brigades of the AFU near Petrovka, Kupyansk, Peschanoye, and Berezovka (Kharkov region).

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to up to 230 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, to include one M113 armoured personnel carrier, one U.S.-made HMMWV armoured vehicle, 13 motor vehicles, and one artillery gun. Three electronic warfare stations and three ammunition depots were destroyed.

πŸ“The Yug Group of Forces’ units improved the tactical situation. Manpower and hardware of four mechanised brigades, one airmobile brigade of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade were hit near Serebryanka, Chasov Yar, Predtechino, Shcherbinovka, Bondarnoye, Fedorovka, Minkovka, Seversk, and Konstantinovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The enemy lost over 140 troops, three pickup trucks, one fuel depot, and one materiel depot.

🚩 The Tsentr Group of Forces’ units liberated Razino (Donetsk People’s Republic) during active operations.

πŸ’₯ Russian troops hit formations of three mechanised brigades, one jaeger brigade, one airborne brigade, two assault regiments of the AFU, one marine brigade, three territorial defence brigades, and one national guard brigade close to Dimitrov, Krasnoarmeysk, Grodovka, Petrovskogo, Boykovka (Donetsk People’s Republic), Novopavlovka, and Dachnoye (Dnepropetrovsk region).

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to up to 440 troops, one U.S.-made HMMWV armoured fighting vehicle, six motor vehicles, and two field artillery guns.

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to more than 180 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, eight motor vehicles, two artillery guns, and one electronic warfare station.

πŸ“The Dnepr Group’s units improved the tactical situation and inflicted losses on formations of one mechanised brigade, one mountain assault brigade, two coastal defence brigades of the AFU, and two territorial defence brigades near Malaya Tokmachka, Novoandreyevka (Zaporozhye region), Tokarevka, Antonovka, and Sadovoye (Kherson region).

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to up to 75 troops, seven motor vehicles, and three field artillery guns. Five electronic warfare stations and six ammunition depots were destroyed.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, strike unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have inflicted damage on the enterprise of the electronic warfare industry, workshops for the production of strike UAVs, their storage areas, the position of the U.S.-made HIMARS MLRss as well as temporary deployment areas of the AFU and foreign mercenaries in 137 areas.

🎯Air defence systems shot down eight guided aerial bombs and 169 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

🎯 In waters of the Black Sea, one uncrewed surface vehicle has been destroyed. 

πŸ“Š  In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy lost

πŸ”Ή 663 aircraft, 

πŸ”Ή 283 helicopters, 

πŸ”Ή 66,777 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

πŸ”Ή 612 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

πŸ”Ή 24,112 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

πŸ”Ή 1,573 MLRS combat vehicles, 

πŸ”Ή 26,894 field artillery guns and mortars, 

πŸ”Ή 37,594 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.