July 25, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 8,560 Ukrainian. Casualties from July 19-25

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 19–25 July 2025

❗️ From 19 to 25 July, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out ten group strikes, including three with high-precision air-, ground-, sea-based, air-ballistic Kinzhal hypersonic missiles, and attack drones, to hit the following targets: Ukrainian defence industry enterprises, military airfields, UAV assembly and storage areas, fuel, missile and artillery weapons and ammunition depots, territorial centres of recruitment of the AFU, temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed groups, nationalists, and foreign mercenaries.

🎯 In addition, four Patriot anti-aircraft missile launchers and one U.S.-made AN/MPQ-65 multi-role radar have been neutralised during the week.

🚩 During the week, units of the Sever Group of Forces liberated the settlement of Varachino (Sumy region).

πŸ’₯ Russian troops inflicted fire damage on clusters of manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, two air assault brigades, one jaeger brigade, one unmanned aerial vehicle brigade, and two assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

↗️ In Kharkov region, the Group’s units improved the tactical situation and defeated one AFU mechanised brigade and two territorial defence brigades.

β–ͺ️ Over the week, the enemy’s losses in the Sever Group’s area of responsibility have amounted to more than 1,150 troops, two tanks, six armoured fighting vehicles, and 37 motor vehicles. Twenty-nine field artillery guns, two ammunition depots, and two electronic warfare stations were neutralised.

πŸ“ The Zapad Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Losses were inflicted on formations of four mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, one airmobile brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and two territorial defence brigades.

β–ͺ️ The enemy lost more than 1,610 troops, nine armoured fighting vehicles, including one HMMWV armoured vehicle, and one U.S.-made MaxxPro armoured vehicle. Ninety-seven motor vehicles, nine artillery guns, 42 ammunition depots, 20 electronic warfare and counter-battery warfare stations of the enemy, including two U.S.-made AN/TPQ-50 counter-battery warfare stations, were neutralised.

🚩 Elements of the Yug Group of Forces continued to advance to the depths of the enemy’s defence and liberated Belaya Gora (Donetsk People’s Republic).

πŸ’₯ Russian troops inflicted fire damage on manpower and military hardware of five mechanised brigades, one airmobile brigade, one mountain assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, two territorial defence brigades, and one national guard brigade.

β–ͺ️ In this direction, the AFU losses amounted to more than 1,135 troops, 14 armoured fighting vehicles, including one U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier, and one U.S.-made HMMWV armoured vehicle. Twenty-four motor vehicles, nine field artillery guns, and 12 ammunition depots of the enemy were neutralised.

↗️ The Tsentr Group’s units continued offensive operations on the territory of the Donetsk People’s Republic and Dnepropetrovsk region. 

🚩 Russian troops liberated Novotoretskoye, Novoekonomicheskoye, and Zverevo (Donetsk People’s Republic).

πŸ’₯ Strikes were delivered at formations of five mechanised brigades, one air assault brigade, three assault brigades, one jaeger brigade, one airborne brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, two territorial defence brigades, and two national guard brigades.

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 2,975 troops, 22 armoured fighting vehicles, including one U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier, and two MLRS fighting vehicles. The AFU losses amounted to 55 motor vehicles and 30 artillery guns, including two U.K.-made 155-mm Braveheart self-propelled artillery systems and two U.S.-made 155-mm Paladin self-propelled artillery systems.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.