July 26, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,320 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 26 July 2025

πŸ’₯ Last night, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a group strike with long-range high-precision weapons as well as with unmanned aerial vehicles against enterprises of the Ukrainian defence industry that manufactured components for missiles as well as those that produce ammunition and explosives.

βœ… The goal of the strike has been achieved. All the assigned targets have been engaged.

πŸ“ The Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Russian troops hit a tank brigade, a mechanised brigade, and two assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Alekseyevka, Bessalovka, Proletarskaya, Maryino, and Sadki (Sumy region).

πŸ’₯ In Kharkov direction, a mechanised brigade of the AFU and a territorial defence brigade have been hit near Tikhoye, Melovoye (Kharkov region), and Kharkov.

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 215 troops, a tank, three armoured fighting vehicles, eight motor vehicles, and four artillery guns. Two electronic warfare stations and one ammunition depot were neutralised.

πŸ’₯ The Zapad Group of Forces improved the situation along the forward edge. Troops of three mechanised brigades, an assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and a territorial defence brigade have been hit near Andreyevka, Kupyansk (Kharkov region), Karpovka, Shandrigolovo, and Drobyshevo (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The enemy losses amounted to more than 220 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, 11 motor vehicles, and one field artillery gun. Four ammunition depots and two electronic warfare stations were neutralised.

πŸ“ The Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Russian elements inflicted damage on two mechanised brigades, a mountain assault brigade, and an airmobile brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Seversk, Pleshcheyevka, Konstantinovka, and Dronovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 180 troops, a tank, an armoured fighting vehicle, two motor vehicles, and four artillery guns.

The units of the Tsentr Group of Forces continued advancing to the depths of enemy defence. Strikes were delivered at formations of two mechanised brigades, an airborne brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a marine brigade, a territorial defence brigade, and a national guard brigade near Dachnoye (Dnepropetrovsk region), Udachnoye, Rodinskoye, Poltavka, and Krasnoarmeysk (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 455 troops, a tank, two armoured fighting vehicles, eight pickup trucks, and three artillery guns.

🚩 As a result of resolute offensive actions, the Vostok Group of Forces liberated Zeleny Gai (Donetsk People’s Republic) and Maliyevka (Dnepropetrovsk region).

πŸ’₯ Strikes were delivered at manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and a territorial defence brigade close to Velikomikhaylovka, Novogeorgiyevka (Dnepropetrovsk region), Iskra (Donetsk People’s Republic), and Temirovka (Zaporozhye region).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 190 troops, an armoured fighting vehicle, eight motor vehicles, and an field artillery gun.

πŸ’₯ The Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on units of a mechanised brigade, a coastal defence brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and a territorial defence brigade near Malaya Tokmachka (Zaporozhye region), Tyaginka, and Tokarevka (Kherson region).

β–ͺ️ More than 60 troops, four motor vehicles, one artillery gun, three ammunition depots, and four electronic warfare stations were neutralised.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, missile troops and artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have inflicted damage assembly and storage areas of unmanned aerial vehicles, ammunition depots, missile and artillery weapon dumps as well as temporary deployment areas of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and foreign mercenaries in 142 areas.

🎯 Air defence systems shot down five HIMARS MLRS projectiles and 257 fixed-wing UAVs.

πŸ“Š  In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost

πŸ”Ή 664 aircraft, 

πŸ”Ή 283 helicopters, 

πŸ”Ή 72,659 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

πŸ”Ή 624 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

πŸ”Ή 24,337 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

πŸ”Ή 1,581 MLRS combat vehicles, 

πŸ”Ή 27,852 field artillery guns and mortars, 

πŸ”Ή 38,722 support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.