August 4, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,160 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 4 August 2025

πŸ’₯ Today, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered a group strike by the Kinzhal aeroballistic hypersonic missiles and attack long-range unmanned aerial vehicles at infrastructure of the AFU military airfields.  

βœ… The goal of the strike has been achieved, all the assigned targets were engaged.

πŸ“Units of the Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Strikes were delivered at manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one air assault brigade, two assault regiments of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade near Pavlovka, Alekseyevka, Varachino, Yablonovka, and Andreyevka (Sumy region).

πŸ’₯ In Kharkov direction, units of one mechanised brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade have been hit near Volchansk and Okhrimovka (Kharkov region).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 120 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, 12 motor vehicles, five artillery guns, and one electronic warfare station.

πŸ“ Units of the Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line. Losses were inflicted on formations of three mechanised brigades, one assault brigade of the AFU, and one national guard brigade close to Kupyansk, Aleksandrovka, Peschanoye (Kharkov region), and Novoselovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).  

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 225 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, and 19 motor vehicles. Three ammunition depots and five electronic warfare stations were destroyed.

πŸ“ Units of the Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of three mechanised brigades, one airmobile brigade, one assault brigade of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade near Konstantinovka, Seversk, Pleshcheyevka, Ivanovopolye, Zvanovka, and Berestok (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 150 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, and one artillery gun.

πŸ“ Units of the Tsentr Group of Forces improved the situation along the front line. Losses were inflicted on formations of two mechanised brigades, one jaeger brigade, one airmobile brigade, two air assault brigades of the AFU, and two national guard brigades near Novopavlovka, Dimitrov, Belitskoye, Rodinskoye, Krasnoarmeysk (Donetsk People’s Republic), and Dachnoye (Dnepropetrovsk region).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 385 troops, two infantry fighting vehicles, two motor vehicles, and two field artillery guns.

↗️ Units of the Vostok Group of Forces continued advancing into the depth of the enemy’s defences. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades of the AFU, one territorial defence brigade, and one national guard brigade near Novogeorgiyevka, Berezovoye (Dnepropetrovsk region), Temirovka, Olgovskoye (Zaporozhye region), and Iskra (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 215 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, seven motor vehicles, and one electronic warfare station.

πŸ’₯ Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of one coastal defence brigade of the AFU and two territorial defence brigades near Malaya Tokmachka, Stepnogorsk (Zaporozhye region), Antonovka (Kherson region), and Kherson.

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 65 troops, three motor vehicles, three electronic warfare stations, and one materiel depot.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack UAVs, Missile Troops, and Artillery of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation struck one production workshop of uncrewed surface vehicles as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian formations and foreign mercenaries in 142 areas.

🎯 Air defence units shot down one U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectile and 120 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

πŸ“Š In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost:

πŸ”Ή 664 aircraft,

πŸ”Ή 283 helicopters, 

πŸ”Ή 74,580 unmanned aerial vehicles,

πŸ”Ή 625 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

πŸ”Ή 24,442 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

πŸ”Ή 1,584 MLRS combat vehicles, 

πŸ”Ή 28,160 field artillery guns and mortars, 

πŸ”Ή 39,115 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.