September 29, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,560 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 29 September 2025.

🪖 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

💥 Units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on three mechanised brigades and two assault regiments of the AFU near Khrapovshchina, Andreyevka, and Alekseyevka (Sumy region).

💥 In Kharkov direction, units of one motorised infantry brigade and one territorial defence brigade have been hit near Volchansk and Varvarovka (Kharkov region).

▪️The AFU losses amounted to more than 170 troops, one tank, two armoured fighting vehicles, 13 motor vehicles, three artillery guns, and one ammunition depot.

🚩 As a result of resolute actions, the Zapad Group’s units improved the tactical situation and liberated Shandrigolovo (Donetsk People’s Republic).

💥 Russian units engaged manpower and hardware of three mechanised brigades, one assault brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade close to Kolodeznoye, Boldyrevka, Petrovka, and Staroverovka (Kharkov region).

▪️ The enemy losses amounted to more than 220 troops, three tanks, two armoured fighting vehicles, 13 motor vehicles, and four field artillery guns. Three electronic warfare stations, one counter-fire station, and five ammunition depots were neutralised.

📍 Units of the Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line. Strikes were delivered on formations of two mechanised brigades of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade near Seversk, Konstantinovka, Berestok and Ilyinovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The enemy lost up to 290 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, 11 motor vehicles, and one field artillery gun. Three electronic warfare stations, as well as nine ammunition and materiel depots, were neutralised.

and one national guard brigade have been hit close to Dimitrov, Udachnoye, Krasnoarmeysk, Rubezhnoye (Donetsk People’s Republic) and Novopavlovka (Dnepropetrovsk region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 515 troops, one tank, five armoured fighting vehicles, five motor vehicles, and four artillery guns.

↗️ The Vostok Group of Forces continued advancing into the depth of enemy defences. Russian troops inflicted losses on one mechanised brigade and one assault brigade of the AFU near Orly, Privolye (Dnepropetrovsk region) and Gulyaipole (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 295 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, five motor vehicles, and two field artillery guns.

💥 The Dnepr Group’s units inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade of the AFU and one coastal defence brigade near Tyaginka, Sadovoye, and Veseloye (Kherson region).

▪️ Up to 70 troops, five motor vehicles, three field artillery guns, and three electronic warfare stations have been neutralised.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, missile troops and artillery of the Russian Group of Forces have inflicted damage on an aviation industry workshop, as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed forces and foreign mercenaries in 149 areas.

🎯 Air defence systems shot down four HIMARS-made MLRS projectiles, two guided aerial bombs, three Neptune long-range guided missiles, and 147 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost

▫️ 667 aircraft, 

▫️ 283 helicopters, 

▫️ 87,277  unmanned aerial vehicles, 

▫️ 631 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

▫️ 25,291  tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

▫️ 1,592 MLRS combat vehicles, 

▫️ 30,044  field artillery guns and mortars, 

▫️ 42,869  support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.