September 30, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense:  up to 1,600 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 30 September 2025

🪖 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

💥 Units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of two mechanised brigades, one jaeger brigade, one assault regiment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and one territorial defence brigade close to Pavlovka, Varachino, Novaya Sech, Kondratovka, and Andreyevka (Sumy region).

💥 In Kharkov direction, Russian troops hit units of one motorised infantry brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade near Volchansk and Bochkovo (Kharkov region).

▪️ The AFU losses were more than 180 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, 10 motor vehicles, one artillery gun, and four ammunition depots.

🚩 As a result of decisive actions, units of the Zapad Group of Forces liberated Kirovsk (Donetsk People’s Republic).

💥 Russian troops launched attacks on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and one territorial defence brigade near Kupyansk, Petropavlovka, Sadovoye (Kharkov region), and Yampol (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The enemy losses were more than 250 troops, one tank, two armoured fighting vehicles, 23 motor vehicles, and two field artillery guns. In addition, four electronic warfare stations and nine ammunition depots were neutralised.

🚩 As a result of decisive actions, the Yug Group of Forces’ units liberated Seversk Maly (Donetsk People’s Republic).

💥 Russian troops delivered strikes at formations of three mechanised brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and one territorial defence brigade close to Ivanopolye, Pleshcheyevka, Aleksandro-Kalinovo, Berestok, and Stepanovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The enemy losses were up to 245 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, 13 motor vehicles, eight artillery guns, and five ammunition and materiel depots.

▪️ The AFU losses were up to 540 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, eight motor vehicles, and one self-propelled artillery system.

↗️ The Vostok Group of Forces’ units continued to advance into the depths of enemy defences. Russian troops inflicted fire damage on formations of two mechanised brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and one National Guard brigade near Alekseyevka, Velikomikhaylovka, Pokrovskoye (Dnepropetrovsk region), and Gorkoye (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ The AFU losses were more than 320 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, 12 motor vehicles, three field artillery guns, and one electronic warfare station.

💥 The Dnepr Group of Forces’ units launched attacks on manpower and hardware of two coastal defence brigades of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade near Malaya Tokmachka (Zaporozhye region), Lvovo, and Belozerka (Kherson region).

▪️ The AFU losses were up to 65 Ukrainian troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, six motor vehicles, seven electronic warfare stations, and one ammunition depot.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces inflicted fire damage on railway transport infrastructure facilities used to transfer weapons and fuel and lubricants to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, long-range unmanned aerial vehicles launch and storage points as well as temporary deployment areas of the AFU and foreign mercenaries in 154 areas.

🎯 Air defence systems shot down two Neptune long-range guided missiles and 128 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost

▫️ 667 aircraft, 

▫️ 283 helicopters, 

▫️ 87,405 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

▫️ 631 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

▫️ 25,304  tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

▫️ 1,592 MLRS combat vehicles, 

▫️ 30,078  field artillery guns and mortars, 

▫️ 42,941  support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.