October 2, 2025

Institute for the Study of War: Russian shadow oil tankers fleet suspected of role in mystery drones over NATO countries

Institute for the Study of War

The Kremlin continues the parallel use of nuclear threats and economic incentives to pressure the United States into normalizing US-Russian relations while explicitly rejecting Russian-Ukrainian negotiations. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov claimed on October 1 that the third round of US-Russian discussions to address “irritants” will “definitely take place before the end of autumn [2025]” but that Russia and the United States have not yet agreed on a specific date.[1] Ryabkov claimed that Russia is waiting for US President Donald Trump’s response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recent proposal to extend Russia’s adherence to the New START Treaty, a bilateral nuclear arms limitations treaty that entered into force in 2011, for one year after it expires on February 5, 2026.[2] Ryabkov further claimed that the United States must either “pursue stabilization” with Russia or engage in “a new arms race, which [Russia] opposes, even though [Russia is] guaranteed to ensure [its] own security.”[3] Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov claimed on October 1 that Russia cannot plan high-level contacts between Russia and Ukraine because Ukraine has stopped the negotiation process.[4] ISW continues to assess that Russia remains committed to normalizing bilateral relations with the United States for economic and political gain while protracting its war in Ukraine to make additional gains on the battlefield as the Kremlin obstructs peace efforts.[5] Russia is also attempting to discredit Ukraine by baselessly accusing the Ukrainian government of halting the negotiation process to distract from Russia’s uncompromising demands that amount to Ukraine’s full capitulation.[6]

Russian shadow fleet oil tankers may be connected to the recent incursions of unidentified drones operating in NATO airspace. Norwegian public broadcaster NRK reported on October 1 that Norwegian authorities spotted an unidentified drone on September 30 near an airport in Bronnesund, prompting authorities to divert one scheduled flight and cancel remaining flights.[7] NRK also reported that Norwegian police detained eight People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizens following reports of an unidentified drone flight near the Svolvaer Airport, arrested one of the tourists, and seized drone equipment. The Norwegian police stated that there is no current apparent connection between a state actor and the Svolvaer Airport or other drone incidents. [8] French authorities stopped the Russian Borocay shadow-fleet-linked tanker off the coast of the Saint-Nazaire port in western France on September 30 and seized the tanker and detained the captain and first mate on October 1.[9] French President Emanuel Macron stated that the Borocay’s crew committed ”very serious offenses.”[10] Maritime-focused news outlet Maritime Executive reported on September 23 that the Boracay was one of three Russian-linked vessels near the coordinated drone incursion that shut down the Copenhagen Airport on September 22.[11] The Maritime Executive reported that European authorities are investigating three Russia-linked vessels that were sailing near the Copenhagen Airport when unidentified drone flights recently forced the airport to close.[12] Danish tabloid Ekstra Bladet reported that the Russian Ropucha-class landing ship Alexander Shabalin had been off the Danish coast for days during heavy drone flights at Danish airports and that Danish authorities are investigating the ship’s role in the drone operations.[13] Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Ukrainian Navy Spokesperson Captain Third Rank Dmytro Pletenchuk similarly reported on September 28 and 29 that intelligence indicates that Russia is likely launching drones into NATO airspace from Russian shadow fleet tankers and is leveraging such vessels to conduct reconnaissance and sabotage missions in international waters.[14]

Key Takeaways

  1. Russia continues to use the mandatory “Conversations about the Important” program to propagate pro-Russian patriotic ideals amongst Ukrainian children and has reportedly exposed over 160,000 children and minors to this program in occupied Donetsk Oblast alone.
  2. Russian occupation officials continue the seizure and redistribution of property assets in occupied Ukraine.
  3. Russia is trying to augment the population of occupied areas by incentivizing the massive resettlement of Russian expatriates to occupied areas, in part by redistributing stolen property to Russian citizens.
  4. Russia is punishing Ukrainian children for perceived anti-Russian or pro-Ukrainian sentiment by placing them in psychiatric treatment.
  5. The Kremlin plans to pilot distributing social payments in occupied Ukraine via the “digital ruble” starting on October 1, furthering the forced integration of occupied Ukraine into the Russian economic sphere. Russia is likely to use the digital ruble as a tool of state oversight and economic control in occupied Ukraine.
  6. Russia continues to expand communications infrastructure in occupied territories of Ukraine.
  7. Russia is continuing efforts to amplify and propagate pro-Russian media voices in occupied Ukraine.
Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.