October 11, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,495 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 11 October 2025

🪖 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

💥 Units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of one mechanised brigade, one jaeger brigade, and one assault regiment of the AFU near Pisarevka, Novaya Sech, Mogritsa, Alekseyevka, and Varachino (Sumy region).

💥 In Kharkov direction, losses were inflicted on units of one motorised infantry brigade of the AFU and one border detachment of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine near Volchansk and Dvurechanskoye (Kharkov region). 

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 165 troops, one tank, one armoured fighting vehicle, and 13 motor vehicles. One ammunition depot and four materiel depots were destroyed.

📍 The Zapad Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades and one assault brigade of the AFU near Drobyshevo, Stavki, Novoselovka (Donetsk People’s Republic), and Kupyansk (Kharkov region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 210 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, 24 motor vehicles, two artillery guns, including a Western-made sample, and ten electronic warfare stations. Four ammunition depots were destroyed.

📍  The Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Losses were inflicted on units of four mechanised brigades, two airmobile brigades of the AFU, and one marine brigade near Dronovka, Ivanopolye, Yablonovka, Kramatorsk, and Konstantinovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 170 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, 13 motor vehicles, one artillery gun, one counter-fire radar, and one electronic warfare station. Three ammunition depots were wiped out.

📍 The Tsentr Group of Forces’ units improved the situation along the front line. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade, four air assault brigades, one airmobile brigade, one jaeger brigade, one special operations brigade of the AFU, and one national guard brigade near Vladimirovka, Novonikolayevka, Toretskoye, Dimitrov, Belitskoye, Rubezhnoye, and Sergeyevka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 525 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, five motor vehicles, and one artillery gun.

↗️ The Vostok Group of Forces continued to advance into the depth of enemy defences. Losses were inflicted on formations of four mechanised brigades of the AFU and two territorial defence brigades near Stepovoye, Sosnovka, Verbovoye (Dnepropetrovsk region), Novonikolayevka, and Uspenovka (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 360 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, 17 motor vehicles, one artillery gun, and two electronic warfare stations. Two materiel depot were destroyed.

💥 Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of one coastal defence brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade near Kamenskoye and Novoandreyevka (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 65 Ukrainian troops, two motor vehicles, six electronic warfare stations, two ammunition depots, and two materiel depots.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces struck transport and fuel and energy infrastructure used by the AFU, weaponry and hardware depots as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries in 148 areas. 

🎯 Air defence units shot down 95 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost

▫️ 667 aircraft, 

▫️ 283 helicopters, 

▫️ 89,528 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

▫️ 631 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

▫️ 25,460 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

▫️ 1,598 MLRS combat vehicles, 

▫️ 30,364 field artillery guns and mortars, 

▫️ 43,694 support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.