November 12, 2025

Hudson Institute:  Russians penetrate Ukrainian lines with light vehicles

Hudson Institute

Ukraine Military Situation Report | November 12

Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War.

Executive Summary

— Battlefield assessment: Russia took advantage of heavy fog to gain additional ground in the embattled city of Pokrovsk. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian military withdrew from multiple settlements near Zaporizhzhia in the face of Russian offensive operations.

— Drone warfare update: Ukraine’s STING drone-intercepting loitering munition has scored more than one thousand kills of Russian-operated Shahed drones, signaling a potential shift in the currently offense-dominated aerial environment.

— What to watch for: (1) Can Ukraine maintain its logistics routes near Pokrovsk? (2) Will Kyiv’s forces withdraw further or counterpunch in Zaporizhzhia?

1. Battlefield Assessment

Last week Ukrainian units faced intense pressure at multiple flashpoints. Kyiv reported that between Monday night and Tuesday night, its forces engaged in some 170 tactical engagements—40 percent of which, according to some estimates, were in or around Pokrovsk.

Russian forces are pressuring the heavily fortified city from an increasing number of axes, conducting offensive maneuvers to encircle Ukrainian combat formations. An open-source intelligence assessment of the area shows that heavy fog is limiting Ukraine’s surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities, which are crucial for defensive operations.

Several hundred Russian troops have already used light vehicles to penetrate Ukraine’s lines of defense and breach the outskirts of the city. Available intelligence suggests that a drone warfare battalion from Ukraine’s 68th Jaeger Brigade has been using first-person-view (FPV) drones to locate and destroy Russian groupings, including small motorbike assault infantry teams.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated that Russia is working to capture the city to signal to the West that supporting Ukraine is futile. Yet Russia’s fight for Pokrovsk has come at a steep cost. Moscow’s forces have borne an average of more than one thousand casualties per day this October and have seen 350,000 servicemen killed in action since January 2025. In all, Russia has suffered more than one million casualties since the start of the war.

Russia blanketed the city of Kupiansk with heavy bombing and drone strikes. Combat operations also continued in the directions of Sloviansk and Lyman despite minimal changes in territory. Unmanned aerial vehicle detachments from Ukraine’s 63rd Mechanized Brigade scored multiple FPV drone kills on Russian combat formations in Lyman.

Russian forces also targeted the civilian population of Kostiantynivka with heavy drone strikes and artillery shelling. Under heavy fire, Ukrainian officials struggled to evacuate the city’s 5,000 remaining citizens. In southern Ukraine, Russian forces also continued to push in the direction of Orikhiv.

Finally, the Ukrainian military has been losing ground at the tactical level on the axis leading to Zaporizhzhia. Ukrainian combat formations were forced to withdraw from defensive positions near the settlements of Novomykolaivka, Okhotnyche, Novye, Uspenivka, and Novouspenivske.

2. Ukraine’s STING Loitering Munition Scores Over One Thousand Drone Kills

Over the past several months, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have rolled out a new drone-intercepting loitering munition known as STING.

A Visual of the STING Counter-Drone System

Picture2-b6cdcad2dc7acf95.jpg

Image from the Wild Hornets via United24 Media.

Developed by the all-volunteer engineering group the Wild Hornets to counter Iran-designed Shahed drones, STING is a quadcopter-hybrid interceptor equipped with a dome-shaped warhead and a thermal camera. It uses a traditional FPV interface with a high-end digital video link and can be easily paired with ground-control stations. It is reportedly capable of reaching speeds exceeding 100 miles per hour and can operate at altitudes near 10,000 feet.

Since making its combat debut earlier this year, STING has scored more than one thousand drone kills. In a potentially promising development, Ukraine’s principal combat formations have begun receiving large numbers of these munitions. Ukraine’s defense industry has even demonstrated the drone’s capability in live-fire drills before a high-level European audience: STING systems destroyed Danish target drones during friendly exercises this October.

Such smart and affordable solutions will only grow in importance as Russian drone production increases. Ukraine’s unmanned systems community warns that Russia’s Center for Advanced Unmanned Technologies—known as Rubicon—is expanding production at a pace that Kyiv cannot match.

Rubicon’s rapid growth reflects two advantages: heavy state funding and a structured recruitment pipeline. It is structured to integrate weapons production, deployment, and operations, and Russian youth programs have militarized thousands of 16- and 17-year-olds, training these minors to be drone operators.

Ukraine’s scaled deployment of STING comes at a crucial time for Kyiv as Russia leverages its institutional muscle to rapidly scale its drone warfare operations.

3. What to Monitor in the Coming Weeks

1. Logistics routes to Pokrovsk: Ukraine has deployed elite combat formations to the embattled city, including personnel from the 7th Rapid Reaction Corps and Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR). Maintaining a smooth logistics flow is vital for Ukraine’s defensive operations. Heavy fog is a key operational parameter.

2. Further withdrawals—or Ukrainian counterpunches—near Zaporizhzhia: In a surprising development last week, Russian pressure forced the Ukrainian military to abandon five settlements near Zaporizhzhia. This report will monitor whether Russia can sustain these gains and move follow-on forces to the area.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.