December 17, 2025

The Hudson Institute:  Russia puts heavy pressure on Siversk as Ukraine counter-attacks in Kupiansk

Hudson Institute

Ukraine Military Situation Report | December 17

Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War.

Executive Summary

— Battlefield assessment: The operational tempo of the war intensified once again. Russian forces exerted heavy pressure near the Ukrainian city of Siversk.

— Drone warfare update: Ukraine used a new submersible variant of its Sea Baby naval drone to target a Russian Improved Kilo–class submarine.

— Ukraine’s long-range strike campaign: Ukraine continued to strike Russia’s oil infrastructure, hitting a refinery in Krasnodar Krai some 240 miles from the front lines.

— What to monitor: (1) Increased Russian pressure in Siversk and (2) Ukraine’s counterattack in Kupiansk.

1. Battlefield Assessment

After a brief slowdown, the operational tempo of the war intensified once again. Russian and Ukrainian forces engaged in over 250 tactical engagements per day last week. Yet widespread Russian pressure yielded no operational breakthroughs.

Russian armored columns operated at a tactical scale on multiple fronts, seeking to capitalize on the initial successes of small infantry assault teams. Ukraine’s drone warfare deterrent worked to combat these motorized probing maneuvers in open terrain. Ukrainian forces inflicted consistent losses, while Russia made limited territorial gains.

Siversk, a city in northern Donetsk Oblast, emerged as a critical flashpoint. Russia has renewed its pressure there, triggering what promises to be weeks of street-to-street fighting. Neither side has achieved decisive control, despite Russian claims to the contrary. The primary risk in this engagement is gradual attrition rather than sudden collapse. Ukrainian combatants maintained their positions in contested areas and inflicted sustained losses on Russian forces. The Bakhmutka River provides a natural barrier and may become the final defensive line should the fight for the city intensify. Ukrainian commanders acknowledge that maintaining control of Siversk will require additional reserves and continuous support.

Elsewhere, Russian forces employed massed fires, aerial assaults, Shahed drones, and infiltrations by small assault teams under the cover of harsh winter conditions. Ukraine repelled the brunt of these attacks on the axes leading to Slobozhanske, Kupiansk, and Lyman. While the situation in Kupiansk is tense and favors the invading forces, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was able to make a surprise visit to the front lines near that embattled city.

The broader Pokrovsk area also continued to host fierce fighting. Russia’s 76th Guards Air Assault Division and Ukraine’s 95th Air Assault Brigade have been combat deployedto this sector. Drones from Ukrainian special forces units preyed on Russian fire support and infantry concentrations in this area. Heightened military activity also raged in the direction of Orikhiv.

Meanwhile, Ukraine continued to strike Russian oil refineries. On December 14, Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Command struck the Afipsky refinery in Krasnodar Krai, some 240 miles from the front lines. The Afipsky refinery is a major oil processing facility in southern Russia, with a capacity of 6.25 million tons of oil per year. The refinery mainly produces gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel for the Russian military.

2. Ukrainian Underwater Drones Reportedly Hit a Russian Submarine

The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) said that it executed a successful underwater strike against an Improved Kilo–class diesel-electric attack submarine docked in Novorossiysk. The Russian Ministry of Defense denied any serious damage to this platform.

Ukrainian sources claim they conducted the attack with Sub Sea Baby robotic naval drones, variants of the Sea Baby systems used in previous maritime strikes. Open-source visuals show traces of an explosion near the submarine. While the latest imagerysuggests that the Russian submarine has not sunk and has been moved to another area of the port, an attack by an undersea drone would have implications that extend beyond damaging a single platform. Improved Kilo–class submarines are central to Russia’s naval strike capabilities, particularly for their ability to launch Kalibr cruise missiles from the Black Sea.

Many details of the new undersea variant of the Sea Baby baseline remain unknown. Online sources describe the weapon as similar to a smart torpedo, but the details of its guidance system and design features are still a mystery. This report will continue to monitor Ukraine’s naval robotic warfare advances and operations in the Black Sea.

3. What to Monitor in the Coming Weeks

1. The fight for Siversk: Russia’s renewed offensive has stressed Ukraine’s defenses in Siversk. Kyiv may opt to rotate troops from other locations to reinforce its defenses in this embattled city.

2. A Ukrainian recovery in Kupiansk: A promising Ukrainian counterattack in Kupiansk has begun to deliver results. A shift in momentum could trigger a command reshuffle for the Russian forces fighting in the sector.

Did a friend forward you this newsletter? Sign up to receive Re: Ukraine here. 

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.