December 24, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,420 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 24 December 2025

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

πŸ“ The Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Losses were inflicted on formations of one heavy mechanised brigade, two mechanised brigades of the AFU, one territorial defence brigade, one national guard brigade, and two border security detachments of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine near Pavlovka, Staraya Guta, Kondratovka, Novovasilevka, Pisarevka, Novaya Sech, and Miropolye (Sumy region). 

πŸ’₯ In Kharkov direction, losses were inflicted on units of three mechanised brigades and one motorised infantry brigade of the AFU near Rybalkino, Staritsy, and Izbitskoye (Kharkov region).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 175 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, and nine motor vehicles. Two materiel depots were destroyed.

πŸ“ The Zapad Group of Forces improved the situation along the forward edge. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of seven mechanised brigades, one airmobile brigade, one assault brigade of the AFU, one territorial defence brigade, and one national guard brigade near Monachinovka, Glushkovka, Pristen, Kupyansk-Uzlovoy, Novosergeyevka, Boguslavka, Blagodatovka (Kharkov region), Drobyshevo, and Krasny Liman (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 210 troops, 10 armoured fighting vehicles, 14 motor vehicles, and one field artillery gun. Two ammunition depots were wiped out.

πŸͺ– The Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Losses were inflicted on formations of two mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, one mountain assault brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, and one territorial defence brigade near Alekseyevo-Druzhkovka, Reznikovka, Dolgaya Balka, Konstantinovka, Kramatorsk, and Kurtovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 220 troops, one Italian-made Puma armoured personnel carrier, one U.S.-made Stryker armoured personnel carrier, two armoured fighting vehicles, 14 motor vehicles, two artillery guns, including one U.S.-made 155-mm Paladin self-propelled artillery system, and one materiel depot.

ems regiments, two assault regiments of the AFU, two marine brigades, two territorial defence brigades, the Azov Special Operations Brigade, and four national guard brigades near Udachnoye, Maryevka, Sergeyevka, Gruzskoye, Lenina, Ivanovka, Shevchenko, Volnoye, Belitskoye, Grishino (Donetsk People’s Republic), and Novopavlovka (Dnepropetrovsk region).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 500 troops, one U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier, eight armoured fighting vehicles, seven motor vehicles, and three field artillery guns.

🚩 Units of the Vostok Group of Forces continued advancing into the depth of the enemy’s defences and liberated Zarechnoye (Zaporozhye region).

πŸ’₯ Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of six mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, two assault regiments of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade near Ternovatoye, Vozdvizhenka, Pridorozhnoye, Lyubitskoye, Gulyaipole (Zaporozhye region), Gavrilovka, Aleksandrovka, and Pokrovskoye (Dnepropetrovsk region).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 245 troops, 17 motor vehicles, two field artillery guns, including one U.S.-made 155-mm Paladin self-propelled artillery system. One POL depot was destroyed.

πŸ”₯ Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of one mountain assault brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade near Stepnogorsk, Grigorovka, Novoyakovlevka (Zaporozhye region), and Tokarevka (Kherson region).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 70 troops, 16 motor vehicles, two artillery guns, one electronic warfare station, one Israeli-made RADA radar station, one P-18 radar station for detecting aerial targets, six ammunition depots, and three materiel depots. 

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces struck defence industry enterprises, fuel, power, and transport infrastructure objects, used by the AFU, as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries in 147 areas.

🎯  Air defence units shot down nine guided aerial bombs, two U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles, and 335 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

πŸ“Š  In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost: 

 669 aircraft, 

 283 helicopters, 

 104,481 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

 640 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

 26,696 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

 1,634 MLRS combat vehicles, 

 32,122 field artillery guns and mortars, 

 49,878 support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.