February 21, 2026

Russian Ministry of Defense:  up to 1,265 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 21 February 2026

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

📍 Units of the Sever Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Losses were inflicted on formations of two mechanised brigades of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade near Novaya Sech, Sennoye, Malaya Korchakovka, Kondratovka, and Miropolye (Sumy region).

💥 In Kharkov region, losses were inflicted on units of one motorised infantry brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade near Kazachaya Lopan, Veterinarnoye, Staritsa, and Prikolotnoye (Kharkov region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 215 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, 11 motor vehicles, two electronic warfare stations, two ammunition depots, and five materiel depots.

🚩 As a result of resolute actions, units of the Zapad Group of Forces liberated Karpovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

💥 Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of three mechanised brigades, one airmobile brigade, one assault brigade of the AFU, and two national guard brigades near Borovaya, Kovsharovka, Osinovo (Kharkov region), and Krasny Liman (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 170 troops, two Kozak armoured fighting vehicles, three artillery guns, including two U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzers, and 21 motor vehicles. Three ammunition depots were wiped out.

📍 The Yug Group of Forces improved the situation along the front line. Losses were inflicted on formations of one mechanised brigade, one airmobile brigade of the AFU, and one national guard brigade near Reznikovka, Kramatorsk, Nikiforovka, Konstantinovka, and Artem (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 110 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, and eight motor vehicles. Two ammunition depots and two materiel depots were neutralised.

📍 The Tsentr Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of one jaeger brigade, one infantry brigade, two mechanised brigades of the AFU, and one national guard brigade near Kucherov Yar, Grishino, Annovka, Novoaleksandrovka, Shevchenko, Belitskoye, Dobropolye (Donetsk People’s Republic), and Novopavlovka (Dnepropetrovsk region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 350 troops, seven armoured fighting vehicles, eight motor vehicles, and two artillery guns.

↗️ The Vostok Group of Forces’ units continued to advance into the depths of enemy defences. Losses were inflicted on formations of one mechanised brigade, one assault brigade, and four assault regiments of the AFU near Velikomikhaylovka, Aleksandrovka (Dnepropetrovsk region), Vozdvizhevka, Verkhnaya Tersa, Lyubitskoye, Charivnoye, and Komsomolskoye (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 370 troops, one tank, one armoured fighting vehicle, and 18 motor vehicles.

📍 Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade and one mountain assault brigade of the AFU near Yulyevka, Kamyshevakha, Grigorovka (Zaporozhye region), and Antonovka (Kherson region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 50 troops, 15 motor vehicles, one U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzer, three electronic warfare stations, and one materiel depots.

✈️  Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation destroyed a transport and load vehicle of a U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS, struck Flamingo long-range cruise missile launchers, transport and power infrastructure of Ukraine used by the AFU, assembly, storage, and pre-flight check sites of long-range unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries in 141 areas. 

▫️ Air defence units shot down one guided aerial bomb, seven U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles, five Flamingo long-range cruise missiles, and 172 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation the enemy has lost: 

 670 aircraft, 

 283 helicopters, 

 115,937  unmanned aerial vehicles, 

 650 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

 27,790  tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

 1,670 MLRS combat vehicles, 

 33,400 field artillery guns and mortars, 

 54,938 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.