DONATE

Current News

Archives

Focus Areas

< Back

March 4, 2026

Institute for the Study of War: Ukraine damages Russian warships

Institute for the Study of War

Ukrainian forces damaged a Russian frigate and other Russian warships during March 1 to 2 overnight strikes against the Russian naval base in Novorossiysk, Krasnodar Krai. A Ukrainian open-source intelligence (OSINT) analyst reported on March 4 that the Ukrainian drone strike against the Novorossiysk naval base damaged PK-10 passive jamming systems, a TK-25 electronic warfare (EW) system, and illumination radars on the Russian Project 11356R Admiral Grigorovich-class frigate Admiral Essen.[1] The analyst assessed that the strike also likely damaged the frigate’s main Fregat-M2M surveillance radar system. Sources in Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) told Ukrainian broadcaster Suspilne on March 4 that the Ukrainian drone strikes damaged the Russian Project 266ME Akvamarin-class (NATO Nastya-class) minesweeper Valentin Pikul and the Project 1124M Albatros-class (NATO Grisha V-class) anti-submarine warfare (ASW) corvettes Yeysk and Kasimov in addition to killing three Russian sailors and wounding 14.[2] A source reportedly affiliated with Russian intelligence agencies claimed that the strike involved at least 200 Ukrainian aerial drones.[3] SBU sources told Suspilne on March 2 that the strikes also damaged the guidance radar of an S-300 air defense system, a Pantsir-S2 air defense system, and six of the terminal’s seven oil tankers.[4] ISW initially reported on this strike in its March 2 update.[5]

Russia is blaming Ukraine for a strike on a Russian tanker in the Mediterranean Sea, accusing Ukraine of “escalating” the war. Maritime security sources told Reuters on March 3 that the Russian-flagged liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker Arctic Metagaz, which is under US and UK sanctions, caught fire in the Mediterranean Sea, with one source claiming without evidence that Ukraine carried out a naval drone strike against the tanker.[6] The Libyan Maritime Authority reported on March 4 that there were sudden explosions on the Arctic Metagaz, followed by a massive fire.[7] The Libyan Maritime Authority noted that the Arctic Metagaz was carrying 61,000 tons of LNG and completely sank roughly 240 kilometers off the coast of Sirte, Libya. The Russian Ministry of Transport accused Ukraine on March 4 of launching unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) from the coast of Libya to strike the Arctic Metagaz near Maltese territorial waters on March 3.[8] The Russian Ministry of Transport claimed that the tanker had departed from Murmansk with legally registered cargo. Russian officials accused Ukraine of “committing acts of terrorism” and of trying to exploit tensions in the Middle East to escalate conflicts, and threatened that Russia could retaliate by shutting down all shipping routes to Ukraine.[9] Russian officials frequently use the allegation of Ukrainian strikes to justify intensified strikes against Ukraine and to deflect blame away from Russia for stalled peace negotiations.[10]

Russian forces are intensifying their use of drones, including Shaheds, at both the tactical and operational levels as part of their battlefield air interdiction (BAI) campaign. Russian forces have recently intensified their use of Shahed drones against Ukrainian frontline targets.[20] Ukrainian Ministry of Defense (MoD) advisor on defense technology and drone and EW expert Serhiy “Flash” Beskrestnov noted on March 3 that Russian forces are increasingly using Shahed drones to strike targets between zero and 20 kilometers from the frontline.[21] This 20-kilometer zone is considered to be the tactical kill-zone (the area within 15-20 kilometers from the frontline where the saturation of tactical strike and reconnaissance drones poses an elevated risk to any personnel or equipment operating within), wherein Russian and Ukrainian forces largely operate smaller tactical systems such as FPV drones.[22] Russian forces may be using Shahed drones in frontline strikes because these drones can carry larger payloads than tactical drones, enabling Russian forces to damage or destroy more fortified structures.[23] ISW continues to assess that Russian forces are intensifying their BAI campaign in the immediate and near rear.[24]

Key Takeaways

  1. Ukrainian forces damaged a Russian frigate and other Russian warships during March 1 to 2 overnight strikes against the Russian naval base in Novorossiysk, Krasnodar Krai.
  2. Russia is blaming Ukraine for a strike on a Russian tanker in the Mediterranean Sea, accusing Ukraine of “escalating” the war.
  3. The Kremlin is continuing its reflexive control campaign that aims to influence French and British nuclear strategy and Coalition of the Willing decision-making
  4. Russian forces continue to execute Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) and commit war crimes against Ukrainian civilians.
  5. Russian forces are intensifying their use of drones, including Shaheds, at both the tactical and operational levels as part of their battlefield air interdiction (BAI) campaign.
  6. Ukrainian forces recently advanced in the Hulyaipole direction. Russian forces marginally advanced in the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area.
Share the Post:
Close

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.