March 21, 2024

Analysis of Fiscal Year 2024 Draft Appropriations for Burma

Background:
On Thursday March 21, 2024, Congress produced a draft for the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act 2024, a package of spending bills for Fiscal Year 2024. The bill will need to pass before Saturday, March 23 to avoid a partial government shutdown.The package’s six spending bills include one for the State Department, foreign operations, and related programs (SFOPS). As the bills are approximately six months late, existing programs had been funded at previous levels by continuing resolutions.
Burma Appropriations:
The SFOPS bill for Fiscal Year 2024 contains $121 million in appropriations for Burma through the Economic Support Fund. This is an increase over the previous year’s appropriations of $50 million through the Economic Support Fund and $40 million in Development Assistance (which has been discontinued).The $121 million figure does not include funding for Burma through Global Health Programs, which in the previous year amounted to $13.7 million through USAID and $32.4 million through the State Department. If GHP assistance to Burma remains constant, as recommended by the Senate, then the total could amount to $167 million in appropriations for Burma, an increase over the Fiscal Year 2023 figure of $136 million.These figures also do not include other pre-existing funding streams related to Burma such as the National Endowment for Democracy or the U.S. Embassy in Burma, or additional commitments of humanitarian aid as in September 2023.
Allocation Guidance:
The $121 million figure for the Economic Support Fund and most of the bill’s language on Burma come directly from the Senate’s original SFOPS bill for Fiscal Year 2024. The spending package currently includes all seven of the specific allocations made in the Senate bill’s accompanying report. The following areas are listed under the Economic Support Fund:Accountability and justice for Rohingya- $1,000,000 Atrocity prevention and accountability, including the documentation and preservation of evidence, and transitional justice programs- $7,000,000 Support for deserters- $1,500,000 Technical support and non-lethal assistance- $25,000,000According to Section 7043 on East Asia and the Pacific, the agreement also includes the following for Burma:Assistance and cross-border programs, including in Thailand and India- $75,000,000 Governance/federalism programs- $10,000,000 Support for current and former political prisoners- $1,500,000
Implications for Policy:
In the three years since Burma’s military coup on February 1, 2021, the U.S. government claims to have spent nearly “$400 million to help pro-democracy entities improve their governance capacity, develop local health and education policies, and refine plans for a political transition to civilian governance.” This is in addition to “over $317 million in lifesaving assistance to people across Myanmar, through both international organizations and local partners.”As these numbers imply, the U.S. government spends significantly more on assistance to Burma than appropriated each year, with humanitarian assistance as the leading category. Still, the funds specifically appropriated for Burma are an important component of overall aid.While the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, contains a 6% cut to appropriations for foreign assistance to other countries, it appears to provide an increase in appropriations for Burma, particularly for pro-democracy programming. Just as importantly, it provides more specific guidance to the Biden administration on the usage of these funds.In particular, the $25 million allocation for technical support and non-lethal assistance is an explicit push for the U.S. government to more directly support pro-democracy forces. This type of non-lethal aid had already been authorized by the BURMA Act but never had specific funding attached. Non-lethal assistance could take any number of forms, such as communications equipment or early-warning systems to protect civilians.One of the other major changes is the explicit inclusion of “assistance and cross-border programs” in India, which was never mentioned in the previous year’s appropriations. This inclusion fulfills a major advocacy goal for CAM, as UNHCR estimates that the coup displaced 59,000 refugees from Northwest Burma, including Chin State, into India.
Relevant Documents:Draft of Further Consolidated Appropriations Act 2024 (here) Draft Joint Explanatory Statement for SFOPS (here) FY 2024 Senate SFOPS Appropriations Bill: S.2438 (here) Accompanying Report for S.2438 (here) The BURMA Act of 2022 (here) CAM’s FY 2024 Analysis (here) CAM’s FY 2023 Recommendations (here)
Contact:
Zo Tum Hmung
Tel. 443-936-8616
zotumhmung@chinmd.org
www.chinmd.org
Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.