February 10, 2025

(AP News) Frozen US aid brings new challenges to groups hit by harsh crackdowns in Russia and Belarus

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko gestures while speaking to the media after voting in a presidential election in Minsk, Belarus, Sunday, Jan. 26, 2025. (AP Photo/Pavel Bednyakov, File)

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko gestures while speaking to the media after voting in a presidential election in Minsk, Belarus, Sunday, Jan. 26, 2025. (AP Photo/Pavel Bednyakov, File) 

By  DASHA LITVINOVA and YURAS KARMANAU

February 7, 2025

TALLINN, Estonia (AP) — Rights groups, activists and independent media in Russia and Belarus endured increased government scrutiny, repressive laws and even being outlawed and forced to operate from exile abroad. Many survived despite the difficulties.

Now some face a new challenge: the decision by U.S. President Donald Trump to freeze for 90 days the aid provided by Washington.

The aid, which came directly from or via the partners of the U.S. Agency for International Development, as well as from other entities funded by the U.S. government, was a source for some of their grant money.

“Objectively, it’s a very bad thing,” an activist with Center-T, a prominent Russian trans group, told The Associated Press, speaking on condition of anonymity for safety reasons. “Organizations could have done much more significant things if it weren’t for this situation.”

Members of Russian and Belarusian rights groups and independent media organizations described varying effects of the action, from “bad” to “unpleasant.” Many get funding elsewhere, like private donations or other grants, but some said they don’t know which of their partners are linked to U.S. aid and whether more will withdraw support.

Aid freeze means cutting expenses, scrapping plans

Some Russian organizations said they’ll still operate but will cut expenses and possibly plans, adding they knew of others in bigger jeopardy.

OVD-Info, a Russian rights group that tracks political arrests and offers legal aid, is largely funded by “private donations from a large number of people,” so the freeze “has little direct and immediate impact,” said OVD-Info spokesman Dmitry Anisimov, but other groups that help it with certain activities are affected.

“Without their existence, our work will become significantly more difficult,” he said, and those in need of assistance will be affected, too.

An editor of an independent Russian news outlet operating in exile echoed Anisimov and also cited crowdfunding as one reliable revenue sources. The editor spoke on condition of anonymity for security reasons.

The outlet lost less than 10% of the budget in frozen grants, the editor said, adding: “Yes, it’s hard, unpleasant, difficult, but we’re not on the brink of imminently shutting down. We’re not even on the brink of laying people off”.

Center-T, whose core staff moved abroad after the Russian Supreme Court designated what it called the LGBTQ+ “movement” as extremist, effectively outlawing all LGBTQ+ activism, also lost only a fraction of funding, its staffer said.

“We are, possibly, in one of the luckiest positions, because we almost didn’t have U.S. funding,” they said.

Kovcheg — Russian for “arc” — a group helping Russians fleeing abroad with shelter, legal and psychological support, training and other support, lost 30% of its budget after Trump’s action, said its founder, Anastasia Burakova.

The funds were allocated for future projects, as well as various improvements, she said. “It’s a shame” they won’t happen, but otherwise, Kovcheg is “more or less stable”, thanks to crowdfunding and advertising, Burakova added.

Burakova, who formerly headed a legal aid group in St. Petersburg backed by exiled tycoon-turned-opposition-figure Mikhail Khodorkovsky, cited repressive laws and regulations that make it harder for critical and independent groups to get funding from Russians.

Laws that drive Russian donors away

Most Russian rights groups and independent news outlets have been designated as “foreign agents” by the Russian authorities — a label that turns potential donors away with its negative connotation. Russia has banned advertising with them.

Others have also been labeled “undesirable,” a category that outlaws any dealings with groups so designated, exposing donors to prosecution.

Many had to move their teams abroad after Russia invaded Ukraine to avoid the ever-widening crackdown.

But, “the more you’re being beaten and banned, the more you adapt and stop counting on just one thing” for your funding, Burakova said.

In light of the aid freeze, Khodorkovsky and Russian philanthropist Boris Zimin this week offered $600,000 to affected Russian and Ukrainian projects.

It’s not clear how much U.S. aid Russian organizations were receiving and how much of that could be offset by Khodorkovsky’s and Zimin’s funding.

“Of course, it wouldn’t be enough,” Zimin said, but “many of these projects are very important, especially, I think, media (projects). I consider it my duty to support them at least for some time.”

The U.S. Embassy in Moscow said it was unable to comment.

Funding losses for Belarus pro-democracy forces

Pro-democracy forces from Belarus told AP the frozen U.S. aid they were receiving -– about $30 million -– accounts for over half of all of their Western funding. It comes from both USAID, either directly or through partners, and entities like the U.S.-government funded National Endowment for Democracy. Dozens of nongovernmental organizations and several independent media groups are on the brink of closure, they said.

Opposition leaders recently prepared a report for Western governments, outlining the effects of the freeze, according to a person close to Belarusian opposition leaders. The person spoke on condition of anonymity for security reasons.

Without Western-supported independent media and pro-democracy forces, Belarus and Russia “will likely fill the void by strengthening state propaganda and authoritarian control in Belarus, allowing pro-Kremlin narratives to dominate the minds of Belarusians,” the person said.

An activist from the Belarusian Association of Journalists said that out of 30 large Belarusian media groups working abroad, six said they lost funding completely and are on the brink of closing. The activist spoke on condition of anonymity because of security concerns.

According to the opposition’s report, $1.7 million in U.S. aid is frozen -– more than half of all foreign aid to independent media forced to flee Belarus after authoritarian President Alexander Lukashenko unleashed a widespread crackdown on dissent in 2020.

Now, small independent newsrooms are laying off employees to avoid closing, the activist said: “If a newsroom stops operating, resuming later is almost impossible, which sets the media apart from other beneficiaries of U.S. aid,” the activist said.

A YouTube show, “A Regular Morning,” with videos regularly drawing over 100,000 views, said it was shutting down but asked for donations and said it would keep going through March.

“We have already found ourselves in situations where the continuation of the project was not obvious, but each time we found a way to continue the work, because we understood that Belarusians need to hear reasonable voices,” its journalists said.

The activist believes dozens of media projects will inevitably cease.

Rights groups also are affected. According to the person close to opposition leaders, 60-80 groups face possible mass layoffs, ending programs or closing for good.

The person expects that “programs to support political prisoners will be drastically cut, Belarusian youth will lose access to alternative educational programs, and activists will lose their platforms.”

There are over 1,200 political prisoners in Belarus, according to Viasna, the country’s leading human rights group, whose imprisoned founder Ales Bialiatski won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2022.

Thousands of activists, including some freed from prison, have moved abroad, and groups that received U.S. funding were helping them and their families.

The freeze will “significantly impair” Viasna’s work, according to activist Pavel Sapelka. But it won’t “stop human rights advocates” entirely, he insisted.

Franak Viačorka, a senior aide to opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, told AP the exiled activist is urgently looking for ways “to keep afloat the independent media and the civil society of Belarus, which has run into a new challenge.”

There was no immediate response to a request for comment from the State Department’s European and Eurasian Bureau.
Link to the original article: https://apnews.com/article/trump-usaid-freeze-russia-belarus-crackdown-bdf3920e8d0748040deee072815b3423

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.