DONATE

Forum

Forums
BCFA Forum Home
An end to foreign a...
An end to foreign a...
 
Notifications
Clear all

An end to foreign aid? USAID – a critical agency under threat.

 
An end to foreign aid? USAID – a critical agency under threat.
1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
42 Views
RSS
 programs bcfa
(@programsbcfausa-com)
Posts: 1
Member Moderator
Topic starter
 

USAID – A Critical Agency Under Threat

 

Quotes on the issue:

"Make no mistake about it, Elon Musk's effort to dismantle the Agency for International Development is a gift to China, it's a gift to Russia, it's a gift to our adversaries around the world." – Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD)

 

"This is a constitutional crisis that we are in today, let's call it what it is. The people get to decide how we defend the United States of America...Elon Musk does not get to decide. We are weaker today than we were yesterday. China sees that, Russia sees that, and they will take advantage." – Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT)

 

"They [USAID] have basically evolved into an agency that believes they are not even a us government agency. That they are a global charity. That they take the taxpayer money and they spend it...irrespective of whether it is in the national interest or not in the national interest." – Secretary of State Marco Rubio

 

 "I think that there are some worthy things, but overall, if you say what is the bang for the buck, I would say it was not very good." – Elon Musk in reference to a question on the worthiness of USAID.

Background:

Just hours after he was inaugurated on Jan. 20, President Trump signed an executive order to pause all spending and activities by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for 90 days.

The President accused the foreign aid agency of massive corruption, wasteful spending, and working against U.S. interests. Elon Musk, the appointed head of the unofficial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), called the agency a “criminal organization” and said it is “time for it to die.” Neither man cited evidence for their assertions.

In the weeks following the initial executive order, (read it at bgng) the administration announced plans to slash the agency’s staff of more than 10,000 to just a few hundred. It placed those working abroad on administrative leave and ordered them to return to the United States, and appointed Secretary of State Marco Rubio as the agency's acting administrator. Rubio, who as a Senator from Florida had high praise for USAID, said the administration is fighting against “rank insubordination” in an agency that works against US interests abroad.

Experts on foreign policy and humanitarian aid have raised the alarm, arguing that USAID plays an essential role in protecting US interests at home and abroad. According to Jeremy Konyndyk, president of Refugees International and former head of USAID’s foreign disaster assistance program, (click here for his presentation to the Council in 2024) the administration’s actions will “diminish the US’s leadership on the world stage.” According to Noam Unger, Senior Fellow at CSIS, AID health programs focused on malaria and AIDS have saved more than 35 million lives and protected US health systems in the process.

Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA), agreed that many of the programs supported by USAID are doing “great work,” but charged that the agency lacks transparency, spends recklessly, and even allowed the diversion of funds to Syria Al Nusra Front, a former  Al-Qaida affiliate – which led the overthrew the Assad regime in December. But it’s not clear whether this was an institutional failing as suggested by the Trump administration. Meanwhile, numerous lawsuits have challenged the constitutional legality of the administration’s actions. On Friday, February 7th, a US district court judge issued a temporary restraining order, blocking the administration from putting USAID employees on leave.

The future of USAID and its humanitarian aid mission is far from certain.

 

What’s your view?  We’ll welcome your contribution to our discussion forum.  Here’s some background reading:

Overview of recent developments and USAID

The Case for USAID

The Administration’s Position and Arguments for Change

This topic was modified 24 hours ago 3 times by Aaron M
This topic was modified 23 hours ago by Aaron M
 
Posted : 13/02/2025 1:52 pm
Forum Jump:
Share:
Close

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.