March 12, 2025

Hudson Institute: Ukraine loses significant territory in Kursk in Russian counter-offensive

Hudson Institute

— Kursk counteroffensive: The Ukrainian military lost significant territory in the Russian region of Kursk, threatening to deprive Kyiv of key leverage in talks to end the war.

— Moscow’s air war: Russia launched massive drone and missile attacks on Ukraine’s cities and energy infrastructure. Ukraine’s new Mirage 2000 fighter aircraft helped defend against the Kremlin’s strikes.

— The importance of US assistance: Washington’s decision to halt intelligence sharing appears to have impeded Ukraine’s combat capabilities.

— Recruitment woes: Ukraine launched a new recruitment program targeting 18-to-24-year-olds.

1. Battlefield Assessment

Last week the Ukrainian military lost substantial territory in the Kursk region of Russia. Russia’s counteroffensive forced Ukraine to withdraw from natural defensive barriers along rivers in the embattled region. The loss of Kursk would deprive Kyiv of key political leverage as the Trump administration pushes for talks to end the war.

North Korean forces played a significant tactical role, capturing important defensive positions on higher ground in Kurilovka. Previous editions of this report warned that large-scale Russian offensive actions with North Korean assistance would be formidable.

Since Russia breached Ukraine’s defenses, Kyiv’s forces have attempted a controlled withdrawal along the R-200 road. Russian and North Korean formations fought to disrupt this maneuver and envelop the Ukrainian elements.

Military withdrawals can be just as demanding as offensive combat operations. Ukraine’s attempted withdrawal is no exception. It aims to secure its rear area and maintain layered fallback positions while conducting delaying actions and tactical counteroffensives to disguise the extent of its retreat. If Ukraine cannot pull off this difficult task, Russian and North Korean forces could envelop its combat formations. This would leave Sumy Oblast in northeast Ukraine militarily vulnerable.

Russia has established fire control over Ukraine’s logistics routes and lines of communication, making Ukraine’s challenge even more daunting. The Kremlin’s forces have been able to disrupt Ukraine’s efforts to move and regroup. The Russian military has employed long-range strike assets and heavy aerial bombs to destroy bridges as it rushes to disrupt Ukraine’s fallback routes.

While the situation in Kursk worsens, Ukraine has taken the offensive near Toretsk. Its forces have made tactical territorial gains there despite exposure to heavy strikes from Russian drones. Pokrovsk also remains a flashpoint.

Both sides continue to make advances in drone-on-drone warfare. Ukraine has begun integrating shotguns into its first-person-view drones to destroy other unmanned aerial vehicles. Meanwhile Russian aerial drones now target Ukrainian unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs).

The Ukrainian military employs these UGVs in logistics roles to move supplies through artillery attacks and anti-tank minefields. Russia’s hunt for Ukraine’s logistics drones is the latest innovation in the ongoing move-countermove cycle of drone warfare.

2. Russia Launches Overwhelming Air Strikes

Last week Russian forces hit Ukraine with massive barrages of Shahed drones. These attacks aimed to soften Ukraine’s defenses for follow-on salvos of cruise missiles, North Korean and Russian ballistic missiles, surface-to-air missiles modified for land-attack roles, and Kalibr naval cruise missiles. Russia targeted Ukraine’s cities and energy infrastructure.

The Mirage 2000 fighters that the Ukrainian Air Force recently received from France took part in the defensive aerial operations against the strikes. Ukraine’s F-16 combat aircraft also defended its skies.

The Russian attacks inflicted casualties and heavy damage on residential buildings in Poltava Oblast. Despite heavy Western sanctions, Russia possesses an abundant supply of domestically produced Shahed drones and air-launched cruise missiles.

Unverified press reports indicate that Washington’s decision to pause intelligence sharing has impeded Ukraine’s ability to proliferate critical air strike warnings to its citizens. Other unconfirmed reports suggest that the United States has stopped sharing operational data to support Ukrainian attacks on Russian troops (but has continued to provide data for defensive operations). The same reports indicate that Starlink, a subsidiary of Elon Musk’s aerospace company SpaceX, continues to provide satellite internet services in Ukraine.

3. Ukraine Enlists Young Fighters amid Manpower Shortages

To replenish its thinning ranks, Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense has introduced a new model of voluntary military service. The recruitment program, dubbed Contract 18–24, offers financial incentives and North Atlantic Treaty Organization–standard military training to Ukrainians between 18 and 24 who are willing to enlist for one year. Soldiers who volunteer under this new force-generation framework will man the Ukrainian military’s 10th Mountain Assault Brigade.

Volunteers will be compensated generously. Contracts offer one million Ukrainian hryvnia (just over $24,000), a zero-interest mortgage, and free medical care. The agreement also provides a one-year exemption from mobilization and the right to travel abroad following the completion of one year of service.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.