May 7, 2025

Hudson Institute: Ukraine makes history with drone shutdown of Russian warplane

Hudson Institute

Executive Summary

— Ukraine makes drone warfare history—again: Ukrainian naval drones used air-to-air missiles to shoot down at least one Russian fighter aircraft.

— Battlefield assessment: The Russian military remained on an offensive footing across multiple flashpoints, targeting Toretsk with boosted combat formations.

— North Korea’s growing role: Ukrainian military intelligence assessed that North Korean troops may soon be fighting in Kharkiv or Sumy.

1. Ukrainian Naval Drones Shoot Down Russian Combat Aircraft

On May 2 near the Russian port of Novorossiysk, a Ukrainian Magura V7 naval drone shot down at least one Russian Su-30 fighter jet using modified AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missiles.

This marks the first time in the history of warfare that unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) have intercepted manned fighter jets. Visuals from the engagement initially indicated that one Su-30 had been struck. But General Kyrylo Budanov, the head of Ukraine’s defense intelligence services, subsequently announced that Ukraine’s forces had downed two aircraft.

Beyond its historic significance, this encounter matters for three reasons. First, it demonstrates the effectiveness of Ukraine’s asymmetric naval warfare capabilities—especially its robotic warfare systems, naval mines, and coastal anti-ship missiles—against Russian forces, namely Russia’s once-formidable Black Sea Fleet.

Second, Ukraine’s successful interception of Russian fighter aircraft showcases a significant shift in the dynamics of naval warfare and reinforces the utility of unmanned systems in modern combat. With limited resources, Ukraine has turned its USVs into effective naval air defense assets.

Third, the incident heralds the success of Ukraine’s “FrankenSAM” project. The project first sought to develop a short-range surface-to-air missile (SAM) system by integrating American AIM-9M Sidewinder air-to-air missiles and RIM-7 Sea Sparrow surface-to-air missiles into Soviet-Russian Buk air defense systems.

Ukrainian USVs have long employed Soviet-vintage R-73 missiles for air defense. But the use of AIM-9 Sidewinders in this interception indicates that Kyiv has extended its FrankenSAM concept beyond Buk systems and modified the AIM-9 to work with indigenous Ukrainian naval missile launchers as well. This technological leap suggests that Ukraine’s software and targeting integration capabilities have evolved more quickly than Kyiv has previously revealed.

2. Battlefield Assessment

Last week heavy combat erupted in Lymansk and Pokrovsk. Flashpoints also emerged in the direction of Kupiansk, in the Kharkiv sector, and in southern Ukraine. Boosted Russian combat formations targeted Toretsk and could soon make significant gains there. Russia also recaptured parts of Belgorod, a Russian region that Ukrainian forces have partially occupied.

The Russian military has endured over 1,200 casualties per day for the last two months. Yet these losses do not appear to have deterred Moscow from pressing the fight. Indeed, Ukrainian military intelligence confirmed that Russian forces have already begun a spring offensive. Kyiv now assesses that North Korean troops may soon be fighting in the Sumy and Kharkiv sectors, in line with this report’s predictions. The division-size force Pyongyang has already deployed to Russia may soon expand to a corps-size force as North Korea joins the fight in occupied Ukraine.

Russian air and missile strikes also surged last week. While Ukrainian interceptionrates remained high, breaches continue to cause significant damage. On April 24 a North Korean tactical ballistic missile hit a residential building in Kyiv, claiming the lives of numerous Ukrainian civilians, including children. Russia’s use of first-person-view drones controlled via fiber-optic cable also remains a pressing threat to Ukraine. Finally, the Ukrainian Air Force continued to fly combat sorties, albeit in a limited concept of operations involving only brief times in the air. Gaps in Russia’s air defense engagement envelopes and surface-to-air missile architecture are likely to tempt Ukraine to conduct increased aerial bombardments against targets of opportunity.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.