DONATE

Current News

Archives

Focus Areas

< Back

January 3, 2026

Institute for the Study of War: Russia issues mild reproach after US intervention in Venezuela 

Institute for the Study of War

The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) issued a boilerplate response condemning the US military operation against Venezuela on January 3. The Russian MFA condemned the US operation and reaffirmed Russia’s support for the Venezuelan leadership’s policies to protect Venezuelan national interests.[1] The MFA called for the United States and Venezuela to find a resolution througs dialogue and stated that Russia is prepared to assist in these efforts. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov spoke on January 3 with Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez and reiterated the MFA’s statements during the call.[2] The Russian MFA denied a January 3 report from Reuters claiming that Rodriguez is in Russia.[3] Russian milbloggers responded to the US operation in Venezuela, including by criticizing the Venezuelan military as weak and unprepared and highlighting Russia’s missile stockpiles and nuclear deterrence capabilities in comparison.[4]

Ukraine met with national security advisors from its Western allies and partners in Kyiv on January 3. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reported on January 3 that he met with the national security advisors of member states of the Coalition of the Willing and representatives of the European Council, European Commission, and NATO.[5] Zelensky reported that the officials discussed a framework peace plan, security guarantees, and the reconstruction and economic recovery of Ukraine. First Deputy Foreign Minister Serhiy Kyslytsya stated that Ukraine presented the main documents from the ongoing peace negotiations to the national security advisors ahead of the January 6 meeting of leaders of the Coalition of the Willing states in Paris.[6]

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced further personnel changes within the Ukrainian government and military. Zelensky reported on January 2 that he proposed current Minister of Digital Transformation Mykhailo Fedorov to take the position of minister of defense.[7] Zelensky noted that Fedorov can implement his experience in facilitating Ukraine’s “Drone Line” project (which aims to integrate drone and ground operations in the Ukrainian military) and digitalizing state services and processes in the defense sector. Zelensky proposed to appointcurrent Ukrainian Defense MinisterDenys Shmyhal as the new minister of energy and first deputy prime minister.[8] Zelensky additionally announced that he will appointFirst Deputy Foreign Minister Serhiy Kyslytsya as the first deputy head of the Office of the President and noted that Kyslytsya will continue to work in the Ukrainian negotiating delegation.[9] Zelensky further reported that he is considering new candidates to head the military administrations in Vinnytsia, Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, Ternopil, and Chernihiv oblasts.[10]

Key Takeaways

  1. The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) issued a boilerplate response condemning the US military operation against Venezuela on January 3.
  2. Ukraine met with national security advisors from its Western allies and partners in Kyiv on January 3.
  3. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced further personnel changes within the Ukrainian government and military.
  4. Ukrainian forces recently advanced in the Kupyansk direction. Russian forces recently advanced in northern Kharkiv Oblast and in the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area.
Share the Post:
Close

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.