February 27, 2026

Institute for the Study of War: Russia prepares artillery and drones for spring offensive

Institute for the Study of War

Russian forces have likely begun artillery and drone preparation of the battlefield for the anticipated Russian Spring-Summer 2026 offensive against Ukraine’s Fortress Belt in Donetsk Oblast. Russian forces shelled Bilenke (roughly 14 kilometers from the frontline and immediately northeast of Kramatorsk, the northern tip of the Fortress Belt — a series of fortified cities that have constituted the backbone of Ukrainian defenses in Donetsk Oblast since 2014) on February 26 and 27 — the first time that Russian forces have hit Kramatorsk or its suburbs with tube artillery.[1] The artillery strikes against Bilenke likely mark the beginning of Russian artillery preparation ahead of the expected Spring-Summer 2026 Russian offensive. Russian forces will likely begin the ground assault phase of this offensive in the near-term following the artillery preparation phase. Russian forces have also been conducting a battlefield air interdiction (BAI) campaign against the southern tip of the Fortress Belt. BAI is the use of air power to strike targets in the frontline’s operational rear (roughly 20 to 100 kilometers from the line of contact) to impact tactical battlefield operations, and Russia has largely been waging its BAI campaign with drone strikes.[2] Geolocated footage published on February 26 shows Russian drone strikes against a civilian cyclist on the H-20 Kostyantynivka-Slovyansk highway northwest of Kostyantynivka and against Ukrainian forces in Oleksiievo-Druzhkivka, both at the south of the Fortress Belt.[3] The H-20 highway is the main ground line of communication (GLOC) connecting the cities of the Fortress Belt. Russian forces have been using monthslong BAI campaigns as part of a broader campaign design aimed at degrading Ukrainian defensive capabilities and frontline positions ahead of Russian ground offensives.[4] A Ukrainian servicemember operating in the Slovyansk direction reported on February 26 that the Russian military command is deploying reinforcements to the Slovyansk direction, another indicator that Russia plans to prioritize offensive operations against the Fortress Belt in the near-term.[5] A Russian ground offensive to seize the Fortress Belt will likely be a multi-year operational effort that would cost the Russian military command significant time, manpower, and resources.[6] Russian forces have so far been unable or unwilling to concentrate the resources required for a decisive offensive operation, particularly against the Fortress Belt.[7]

Russia is reportedly expanding recruitment efforts in higher educational institutions to staff the Russian Unmanned Systems Forces (USF). The BBC Russian Service reported on February 27 that the Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) has expanded its recruitment efforts to at least 95 educational institutions across Russia and pressured students to sign contracts with the MoD during face-to-face meetings at 90 of these institutions.[8] The BBC Russian Service noted that the 95 educational institutions do not include institutions where the Russian MoD is conducting “indirect recruitment,” such as opening unmanned systems centers at Russian universities. The BBC Russian Service noted that Russian universities are publicizing successful recruitment efforts, likely to entice more students to sign contracts with the MoD. Germany-based Russian opposition outlet Echo reported February 26 that the Russian MoD is recruiting students from at least 57 universities and 13 colleges and technical colleges in 24 federal subjects, including occupied Crimea and has expanded its recruitment campaign to include all students, not just those underperforming academically. Echo noted that the Russian MoD is promising to students that they will only serve in USF units (a preferable military occupation that faces lower risk to life and limb than infantry) but that at least some of the contracts contain language that would allow the MoD to send the recruits to any Russian military unit, not just a USF unit.[9] Echo reported that the Russian MoD is utilizing a ”carrot and stick” tactic by offering benefits including large salaries, a guaranteed single year of service, education grants, and student debt forgiveness, and also by coercing and threatening students into signing contracts. Russian opposition outlet Meduza reported on February 26 that the Nikolai Lunin Novosibirsk College of Transport Technologies organized a three-day screening of propaganda films about Russians who allegedly “betrayed” Russia because the students had refused to volunteer for military service.[10] The Russian MoD began recruitment efforts targeting underperforming Russian students in December 2025 and began expanding this effort in January 2026.[11] The Russian MoD may staff the conventional Russian military with student recruits. Russian forces are increasingly struggling to hit recruitment targets, with Russia’s casualty rate outpacing the recruitment rate in January 2026, for the first time since the start of the full-scale invasion.[12]

Russian forces likely used white phosphorus in Kostyantynivka and may have indiscriminately affected civilian areas in violation of international law. Geolocated footage published on February 27 shows a Russian strike with what appears to be white phosphorus munitions against southwestern Kostyantynivka, Donetsk Oblast.[28] A Ukrainian brigade operating in the Kostyantynivka direction reported that Russian forces used white phosphorus in the strike and immediately after struck the area with a FAB-1500 guided glide bomb.[29] While ISW cannot assess whether the impacted area contained civilians, civilians still remain in Kostyantynivka. The Ukrainian brigade reported that roughly 2,000 civilians remain in Kostyantynivka. Protocol III of the Convention on Conventional Weapons prohibits the use of incendiary weapons, such as white phosphorus, against civilian targets or in areas with concentrations of civilians.[30] Russian forces notably have used white phosphorous and incendiary munitions allegedly in violation of international law in Ukraine before.[31]

Key Takeaways

  1. Russian forces have likely begun artillery and drone preparation of the battlefield for the anticipated Russian Spring-Summer 2026 offensive against Ukraine’s Fortress Belt in Donetsk Oblast.
  2. Russia is reportedly expanding recruitment efforts in higher educational institutions to staff the Russian Unmanned Systems Forces (USF).
  3. The Kremlin is continuing to crack down on pro-war information space figures that it cannot fully co-opt or subordinate to state control as part of wider efforts to consolidate the information space under the Kremlin’s control.
  4. Russian drone approached the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle in the Swedish port of Malmo on February 25.
  5. Russian forces likely used white phosphorus in Kostyantynivka and may have indiscriminately affected civilian areas in violation of international law.
  6. Ukrainian forces recently advanced in the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area and near Oleksandrivka. Russian forces recently advanced near Hulyaipole.
Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.