April 8, 2022

Missile that targeted railway station ‘launched from Ukraine-held territory’, Russia claims

Russian Defense Ministry

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue to conduct a special military operation in Ukraine.

💥 On the day of April 8, a large warehouse of missile-artillery weapons in the area of the settlement of Nimirovskoye Odessa region was destroyed by high-speed air-base missiles. The air equipment of the Ukrainian armed forces was also destroyed at the Kanatovo military airport in the Kirovograd region.

💥 54 military objects of Ukraine were affected by the prompt and tactical aviation of the Russian Federation. Among them: a control point, two combustion warehouses, a field ammunition warehouse, two installations of jet fire systems, as well as 45 support points and areas of concentration of Ukrainian military equipment.

💥 Russian anti-aircraft defense in the area of the Novomikhaylovka settlement, a Ukrainian Su-27 plane crashed into the air.

📊 In total, since the beginning of a special military operation, 126 planes, 421 drone aircraft, 2024 tanks and other armored vehicles, 225 installations of backfire jet systems, 876 field artillery weapons and mortomets, as well as 1923 units of special military automotive equipment.

◽️ Today, April 8, Ukrainian armed forces attacked the railway station of Kramatorsk with a tactical missile “Point-U” by the Ukrainian armed forces.

◽️ Tactical missiles “U-Point”, whose debris was discovered in the area of the Kramatorsk railway station, are used only by Ukrainian armed forces.

❗️ I would like to note that the maximum flight range of the “Point-U” rocket is 120 km. The mass of the combat unit is 482 kg and contains 20 fringe combat elements, each 7.5 kilograms, forming about 16 thousand fringe.

◽️ Analysis of the radius of the defeat of the combat unit, as well as the characteristic position of the tail part of the “Tochka-U” missile, clearly confirm that it was launched from the south-west direction of Kramatorsk.

◽️ According to the existing intelligence data, one of the divisions of the 19 missile brigade, armed with “Tochka-U” missile complexes at the time of the strike on Kramatorsk, was in the area of the Dobropolje Donetsk region, 45 km south-west of Kramatorsk. This district is currently under complete control of the Ukrainian group of troops in Donbass.

◽️ I would like to emphasize that the Ukrainian armed forces still have a significant arsenal of “Point-U” missiles.

◽️ Before the beginning of a special military operation, there were 20 “Tochka-U” missile complexes at the disposal of the Kiev regime, which consisted of two launch units.

◽️ In the course of conducting a special military operation, 8 Ukrainian “U” launch facilities were destroyed and about 90 percent of rockets on arsenals.

◽️ Nevertheless, the threat of continuing the Kiev regime of provocations and missile strikes on settlements with civilians remains high.

◽️ The joint operation of the troops of the Donetsk People’s Republic and the units of the Russian armed forces for the complete liberation of the city of Mariupol continues.

◽️ The results of radio interceptions show that in addition to the Nazis from the “Azov” battalion and the remains of the Ukrainian armed forces, there are a significant number of foreign mercenaries in the occupied areas of the city. In addition to Ukrainian and Russian, radio negotiations are held in six more, mostly European foreign languages.

◽️ It is obvious that the city is now blocked not the defenders of the so-called “European values”, but the foreign hirers. Those who came to kill Slavs for American dollars, covering themselves with a “live shield” from civilians.

◽️ The Kiev nationalist regime refused to withdraw militants from Mariupol.

With this in mind, the city will definitely be liberated by the troops of the Donetsk People’s Republic and the units of the Russian armed forces.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.