August 25, 2023

Myanmar regime looks to restart hydroelectric project in northern Shan State

Myanmar Now

A large-scale hydropower project stalled since state-owned French company Électricité de France (EDF) pulled out of Myanmar in 2021 over concerns about the regime’s human rights abuses may soon restart if the junta has its way.

The regime’s Ministry of Electric Power has recently called for a tender to resume the Shweli (3) project, as the third hydropower project on the Shweli River in northern Shan State is known.

According to a tender notice published on August 17, private investors can purchase tenders for 500,000 kyat between August 21 and September 11 and must submit their project proposals by November 24.

First conceived during the time of former dictator Than Shwe, the Shweli (3) project did not really start to move forward until 2018, when the then National League for Democracy government entered into a Notice to Proceed agreement with EDF in partnership with Japan’s Marubeni Corporation and Myanmar’s Ayeyar Hinthar Company.

Located some 12 miles north of the town of Mongmit (Momeik) in northern Shan State, the US$1.5 billion project was designed to produce 670 megawatts of electricity. It was expected to be completed by 2025, but has been on hold since EDF announced that it was pulling out in March 2021, a month after the military seized power.

The decision to try to restart the project comes after the regime appointed a new minister of electric power earlier this month. That move came as the junta extended the state of emergency under which it holds power for an additional six months from August 1.

According to a retired director of the ministry, up to five groups of companies have submitted letters of interest behind the scenes. However, he added, the tender process is just a sham.

Most likely, the project will go to a Russian company with ties to top generals, including Lieutenant-General Nyo Saw, chair of the military-owned Myanmar Economic Corporation, he said.

“I think the Russian company will win the project,” he said, adding that “Shweli (3) is a very good project.”

A ceremony held in September 2018 to mark the signing of an agreement to start work on the Shweli (3) hydropower project

Dependency on Russia

He noted, however, that Russian companies are unlikely to have billions of dollars to invest in such a project, and that they also lack experience with hydropower projects.

“Russia does not have much money, and it isn’t really a developer,” he said.

Despite this, however, the regime has become increasingly dependent on cooperation with Russian governmental agencies and companies to implement its development projects. Shunned by most Western countries since the coup, it has signed deals with the Russian state-owned Rosatom company and others to try to meet the country’s energy needs.

Russian president Vladimir Putin and Myanmar junta chief Min Aung Hlaing in Vladivostok, Russia, in 2022

In April of this year, another company associated with the Shweli (3) project announced that it was also pulling out of Myanmar. AFRY, a Sweden-based engineering and design company, said it had been involved in the country for more than 20 years, but would leave by the end of this year at the latest “due to the negative development in the country” since the coup.

In February 2010, Switzerland’s Colenco Power Engineering (now owned by AFRY) signed an agreement with the regime of former dictator Than Shwe to do consultancy work for the Shweli (3) project. Two months later, the senior general toured the site of the project with his energy ministers, Htoo Company owner Tay Za, and then Lieutenant General Min Aung Hlaing, who went on to become Than Shwe’s successor as commander-in-chief of the armed forces and head of the current junta.

The Swiss company originally estimated that Shweli (3) could generate up to 1,050 megawatts of electricity, but by the time EDF became involved, this was reduced to 670 megawatts due to the presence of two other projects—one completed and the other planned—on the upper part of the river, Shweli (1) and Shweli (2).

A feasibility study for the Shweli (3) project estimated that it would take at least six to seven years to complete, according to the retired Electricity Ministry director. But that would only be possible if there were no funding issues or other delays, he added.

Diminished capacity

It’s unclear if the regime will be able to follow through on its plans for Shweli (3). In July of last year, it called for tenders to implement six hydropower projects, but it is not known if there were any takers.

Meanwhile, Min Aung Hlaing has made bold statements about plans to introduce electric trains and cars powered by wind, solar and even nuclear energy. But far from making a leap forward in terms of energy use and production, Myanmar remains mired in perpetual shortages that have only gotten worse over the past two and a half years.

In the immediate aftermath of the 2021 coup, the country’s capacity approached nearly 4,000 megawatts, but by April 2023, it had dwindled to around half that amount.

Predictably, the regime has blamed its opponents for its failure to meet the country’s energy needs, accusing anti-junta guerrilla groups of attacking and destroying power plants, power lines and substations. By May of this year, some 200 such attacks had been reported across the nation. 

Another cause of the problem, according to Min Aung Hlaing, was the suspension of large hydropower projects under previous administrations.

But even as he continued to make excuses, in early August the junta leader was forced to admit that under his rule, Myanmar has been unable to meet even half of its energy needs, making it likely that he will push hard to get Shweli (3) and other projects back on track.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.