March 25, 2025

Myanmar’s junta seeks to regain air edge with foreign night vision drones

The drones from China and Russia are fitted with infrared cameras, allowing them to attack at night.

RFA Burmese – March 15, 2025
Link to the original article.

A Chinese-made high-tech surveillance drone of junta forces was seized by resistance forces  after it crashed in Ayadaw township, Sagaing region, Myanmar, Sept.4, 2024.

A Chinese-made high-tech surveillance drone deployed by junta forces was seized by rebel fighters after it crashed in Ayadaw township, Sagaing region, Myanmar, Sept. 4, 2024. (Radio NUG)

Read RFA coverage of this topic in Burmese.

Chinese- and Russian-made drones using night vision cameras are giving Myanmar’s military junta an advantage in its war against rebel groups, according to sources on the ground, touching off what one observer termed a “drone arms race” between the two sides.

The new weaponry is upping the ante in Myanmar, where drones were once solely a tool of the armed opposition seeking a cheap way to level the playing field against a far better-equipped military, which seized control of the country in a 2021 coup d’etat.

Since early February, pro-junta channels on the social media platform Telegram have posted video footage of what appears to be military drone bomb attacks on rebel forces in Kachin state’s Bhamo township using either infrared or thermal night vision cameras and causing casualties.

On Feb. 20, British military intelligence publisher Janes International Defense Review cited the footage in a statement which claimed that Myanmar’s military “has begun enhancing its expanding unmanned aerial vehicle capabilities, adapting forward-looking infrared systems for tactical attack drones.”

Officials from two anti-junta groups — the Kachin Independence Army, or KIA, and a civilian defense unit based in Bhamo — confirmed to RFA Burmese that the military has deployed such drones in combat to devastating effect.

“The junta is using night vision drones in Bhamo battles,” said KIA spokesperson Colonel Naw Bu. “Our officials in the fighting reported that the drones are very advanced, with night vision cameras.”

Naw Bu said he was unaware of night vision drones being used by the military in other parts of the country.

Infrared imaging uses radiation emitted or reflected by objects to create images, while thermal imaging measures heat emitted by objects to create images based on temperature differences. Both provide users with a way to track objects at night.

It was not immediately clear which technology the drones were fitted with. Thermal cameras are a type of infrared camera, but not all infrared cameras produce thermal images.

Drones from China, Russia

Fighting between the junta and the KIA has been intensifying in Bhamo since early January, according to sources in the region.

A member of an anti-junta civilian defense group in Bhamo told RFA that junta forces had been using night vision drones for “about a month” and called their destructive power “considerable.”

“We have [equipment] that can disrupt radio frequencies, and when we hear a drone flying overhead, we have time to defend against it,” said the fighter, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to security concerns. “Nonetheless, on some occasions, we continue to face [drone] attacks with highly explosive bombs, despite our preparations.”

The rebel fighter did not disclose details of casualties caused by these drones, and RFA was unable to independently verify confirm the number of people killed or injured in the attacks.

Senior General Min Aung Hlaing and his delegation view military equipment at the Higher Military Command School in Novosibirsk, Russia, July 16, 2022.
Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing and his delegation view military equipment at the Higher Military Command School in Novosibirsk, Russia, July 16, 2022. (Myanmar Military)

Some ethnic armed and civil defense groups have claimed that the junta is using drones made in Russia and China — two countries that have backed the military regime since the coup — with a higher reliance on those from China.

Captain Zin Yaw, a former military officer and a member of the Civil Disobedience Movement of public servants who quit their jobs to protest the coup, told RFA that the junta is likely to continue pursuing advanced drones.

“We see that they are actively seeking advanced technology to engage in modern warfare,” he said. “The junta chief [Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing] recently visited Russia, and they may have gained a technological advantage from the trip.”

‘Drone arms race’ underway

Attempts by RFA to contact junta spokesperson Maj. Gen. Zaw Min Tun for comment on the military’s use of high-tech drones went unanswered by the time of publishing.

But Thein Tun Oo, the executive director of the Thayninga Institute for Strategic Studies, composed of former military officers, told RFA that he expects the junta will gain a significant advantage with the advanced technology.

“Armed resistance forces should reassess their strategies because their available resources are no match for those of the nation’s military,” he said. “Over time, their resources will dwindle, while the [junta] continues to expand its capabilities.”

Jonah Blank, a senior political scientist at global policy think tank the RAND Corporation, said the military and rebel forces “are now in a drone arms race,” after rebels deployed drones to challenge the junta’s air superiority and the military responded with more advanced drone technology “to try to regain its edge.”

“But these technological advances tend to become cheaper and more easily available very quickly — the rebels will soon have them too,” said Blank, who is also a senior research fellow at the National University of Singapore.

He characterized drones as “inherently democratizing technology,” noting that even the most advanced U.S. and Chinese drones “are far less expensive than these powers’ manned aircraft.”

“This trend inherently favors an irregular army,” he said.

According to data compiled by RFA, junta air and artillery strikes killed at least 1,769 civilians and injured some 3,720 across the country in 2024.

Translated by Aung Naing. Edited by Joshua Lipes and Malcolm Foster.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.