September 12, 2023

Myanmar’s political detainees face unprecedented restrictions after military officer takes over prison department

Myanmar Now

Relatives of political prisoners incarcerated nationwide say that in recent months allowances for accepting food parcels have been slashed and communications cut further

Han Thit Nay Min NiSeptember 11, 2023

Violations of basic rights in prisons nationwide are on the rise since an army officer was named by the junta as director-general of the country’s Prison Department two months ago, Myanmar Now has learned. 

On July 12, Myo Swe, who is believed to have served at or above the rank of colonel, was appointed on a probationary basis to the department’s top position, which operates under the home affairs ministry. Some 20 other officers, all ranked as captains, were also assigned to positions at the lower, supervisory level at that time. 

Myanmar Now recently spoke to several relatives of political prisoners currently being held in Insein Prison in Yangon; Myingyan and Obo in Mandalay; Bago, Thayawaddy and Taungoo in Bago; Dawei in Tanintharyi; Thayet in Magway; and Monywa in Sagaing Region. The sources said that under Myo Swe’s leadership, new restrictions on inmates had been introduced, particularly concerning food and communications. 

A woman providing for two family members in junta prisons explained that in order to bring necessary supplies to her incarcerated relatives, she is now required to show original household registration forms and identification cards. 

“We used to only need copies of those documents, but we need the originals now. It only started this year,” she said. 

While she once had been allowed to bring an unlimited amount of fruit to the prisoners, starting on September 6, only one kind of fruit was permitted to be delivered, she noted. Instant noodle pack allowances have also been reduced from 10 to five, as well as instant coffee, from 30 to 15 packs. 

Prisoners are also no longer allowed to send letters outside, the woman said. 

“I heard that he wrote a letter before he received his sentencing but we still haven’t gotten to read it,” she told Myanmar Now of one of her detained relatives. 

An officer with the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (AAPP) confirmed that “for around two months now” prisoners have not been permitted to send written communications to their family members. 

“Prisoners used to be able to write letters to their families outside with the permission of the prison superintendent,” the officer said. “They’re torturing not just the political prisoners but also their family members. Just think about how they would feel not being able to see their loved ones for a long time all the while not knowing what’s happening to them. There are no words to describe their pain and worry.” 

The officer added that this restriction is unprecedented, even under previous repressive military regimes headed by generals Ne Win and Than Shwe. 

A Hla Lay Thuzar, a journalist who was released from Insein Prison in January after serving 16 months, explained that food packages from family members were necessary for her survival during her incarceration. She recalled how prison meals rotated between two eggs or chicken once a week, and fish or a sour soup each twice a week.

“The eggs were sub-standard and many people couldn’t even eat the fish curries. The chicken curries also contained feathers,” she said. “The food provided by the prison is so bad that nobody could actually eat it. The prisoners can’t also tell their families what they need for food as they’re not allowed to meet them in person. They have to eat whatever their families send. Even so, many of the care packages didn’t arrive and they had to starve.” 

Myanmar Now’s conversations with relatives of inmates in prisons in Bago and Mandalay confirmed that food parcels were being restricted there, as well. 

In Myingyan Prison, prisoners are only allowed to receive a maximum of 800g of three types of fried dishes in parcels from their families, according to the mother of one of one political detainee. 

She used to send her son 3-4 kg of fried peanuts and dried beef during each visit, but noted that it was “not possible anymore” and that she would not be able to make more frequent trips due to the time and expense involved. 

“I’m from Mandalay, so I can’t go to the prison every two weeks,” she said, referring to the more than 100 km distance between the locations, a journey that costs 30,000 to 50,000 kyat (US$14-24) each time. 

Myanmar Now previously reported how authorities in Myingyan Prison had been accused of beating inmates and putting them in solitary confinement for allegedly hiding and using mobile phones. More than 800 political detainees are incarcerated at the site, including Dr Myint Naing, the ousted chief minister of Sagaing Region. 

A 40-year-old political prisoner recently released from Bago Prison said that inmates were restricted to receiving two fried dishes, seven packs of coffee mix sachets, three uniforms, four blankets—since no mattress was provided—and a bucket to serve as their toilet. 

“They used to have no limits on these things in the past but everything changed after they started searching prisoners for mobile phones in late August,” he told Myanmar Now. 

The aforementioned AAPP officer commented that it was not a coincidence that the military council had imposed new restrictions on prisons nationwide.

“They’re doing it on purpose. They’re appointing military officers as prison authorities in order to oppress [the prisoners] further. It’s a very clear tactic,” he said.

As of early September, there were more than 24,000 political detainees in prisons across Myanmar, according to AAPP. 

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.