February 24, 2026

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1005 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 24 February 2026

▫️ The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

hree mechanised brigades of the AFU, two territorial defence brigades, and a national guard brigade were hit near Olshanka, Sennoye, Bachevsk, Khrapovshchina, and Pokrovka in Sumy region.

🔥In Kharkov region, units of three mechanised brigades of the AFU were hit near Krasny Yar, Grafskoye, Volchanskiye Khutora, and Kolodeznoye in Kharkov region.

▪️The AFU losses amounted to up to 215 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, nine motor vehicles, one Western-made MLRS system, and two field artillery guns, including one U.S.-made M777 howitzer, as well as two electronic warfare stations. An ammunition depot and ten material depots were neutralised.

📍The Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Russian troops engaged manpower and hardware of three mechanised brigades of the AFU and two national guard brigades near Monachinovka, Chervony Oskol, Borovaya, Novoosinovo in Kharkov region, Aleksandrovka, and Krasny Liman in the Donetsk People’s Republic.

▪️The AFU losses amounted to up to 170 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, including one U.S.-made HMMWV armoured vehicle, 19 motor vehicles, two artillery guns, including one Western-made artillery gun, and two electronic warfare stations.

▫️ The Yuzhnaya Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line. Strikes were delivered at formations of three mechanised brigades, one assault brigade of the AFU, and a marine brigade near Alekseyevo-Druzhkovka, Druzhkovka, and Shabelkovka in the Donetsk People’s Republic.

▪️The AFU losses amounted to up to 115 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, 15 motor vehicles, three field artillery guns, including one Western-made artillery gun, and five electronic warfare stations. One ammunition and two materiel depots were eliminated.

📍The Tsentr Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, a jaeger brigade, an air assault brigade of the AFU, a marine brigade, a territorial defence brigade, and a national guard brigade near Novoaleksandrovka, Vodyanskoye, Dobropolye, Sergeyevka in the Donetsk People’s Republic, Novopodgorodnoye, and Mezhevaya in Dnepropetrovsk region.

▪️The AFU losses amounted to up to 335 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, nine motor vehicles, and one MLRS combat vehicle.

lose to Verkhnyaya Tersa, Lyubitskoye, Barvinovka, Charivnoye (Zaporozhye region), and Velikomikhaylovka (Dnepropetrovsk region).

▪️The enemy lost up to 170 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, and 18 motor vehicles.

💥 The Dnepr Group’s units inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of a mechanised brigade and a mountain assault brigade near Kirovo and Orekhov in Zaporozhye region.

▪️Up to 70 troops, 17 motor vehicles, one Western-made field artillery gun, and one electronic warfare station were neutralised.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, missile troops and artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have inflicted damage on transport and energy infrastructure facilities used in the interests of the AFU, UAVs storage and preparation facilities, as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries in 154 areas.

▫️ Air defence systems shot down six guided aerial bombs, six MLRS projectiles, and 380 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost

▫️ 670 aircraft, 

▫️ 283 helicopters, 

▫️ 117,184 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

▫️ 650 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

▫️ 27,851 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

▫️ 1,673 MLRS combat vehicles, 

▫️ 33,460 field artillery guns and mortars, 

▫️ 55,166 support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.