January 19, 2026

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to. 1,080 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 19 January 2026

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

📍Units of the Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Russian troops inflicted losses on the formations of one mechanised brigade, one motorised infantry brigade, one jaeger brigade, one assault regiment of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade near Novaya Sech and Miropolye (Sumy region).

🔥In Kharkov direction, units of one mechanised brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade have been hit near Okhrimovka, Volchanskiye Khutora, and Neskuchnoye of Kharkov region.

▪️The enemy lost more than 170 troops, an armoured fighting vehicle, 16 motor vehicles, one electronic warfare station, and five ammunition and materiel depots.

📍Units of the Zapad Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Russian units engaged personnel and hardware of one mechanised brigade, one assault brigade, one airmobile brigade of the AFU, one territorial defence brigade, and one national guard brigade near Kovsharovka, Novoosinovo, Novoplatonovka, Boguslavka, Blagodatovka (Kharkov region), Sosnovoye, Yarovaya, and Krasny Liman in the Donetsk People’s Republic.

▪️The enemy losses amounted to more than 200 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, 16 motor vehicles, two field artillery guns, and four ammunition depots.

📍Units of the Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Units of two mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, and one mountain assault brigade of the AFU have been hit near Konstantinovka, Krasnotorka, Stepanovka, Reznikovka, and Berestok (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️Up to 225 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, 13 motor vehicles, two artillery guns, and one Grad MLRS vehicle of the AFU have been neutralised. One electronic warfare station, two ammunition and POL depots were neutralised.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.