January 29, 2026

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,150 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 29 January 2026

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

🚩 As a result of intensive actions, units of the Sever Group of Forces established control over Belaya Bereza in Sumy region.

πŸ”₯Russian troops engaged units of one mechanised brigade of the AFU close to Proletarskoye and Kondratovka (Sumy region).

πŸ“In Kharkov direction, units of one motorised infantry brigade of the AFU and one national guard brigade have been hit near Grafskoye, Revolyutsionnoye, and Volchanskiye Khutora in Kharkov region.

β–ͺ️The enemy lost more than 90 troops, six motor vehicles, and one field artillery gun. One ammunition depot and one electronic warfare station were destroyed.

πŸͺ– The Zapad Group of Forces improved the situation along the front line. Three mechanised brigades, two assault brigades, and one assault regiment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine have been hit near Kutkovka, Kovsharovka, Glushkovka (Kharkov region), Yarovaya, Drobyshevo, Ilyichevka, and Koroviy Yar (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️The enemy losses amounted to more than 190 troops, one U.S.-made HMMWV armoured vehicle, 17 motor vehicles, and two artillery guns. Six ammunition depots were destroyed.

πŸͺ– The Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Three mechanised brigades and one assault brigade of the AFU were hit near Alekseyevo-Druzhkovka, Minkovka, Stepanovka, and Konstantinovka in the Donetsk People’s Republic.

β–ͺ️The AFU lost up to 150 troops, five armoured fighting vehicles, including one U.S.-made Stryker armoured personnel carrier, 19 motor vehicles, two field artillery guns, and two electronic warfare stations. Five ammunition depots and one materiel depot were neutralised.

rritorial defence brigade, and two national guard brigades close to Shevchenko, Novogrigorovka, Belozerskoye, Belitskoye, Novoaleksandrovka, Kutuzovka, Grishino, Torskoye, and Rayskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to more than 325 troops, six armoured fighting vehicles, 11 motor vehicles, one Grad MLRS combat vehicle and three artillery guns.

πŸͺ– The Vostok Group of Forces continued advancing to the depth of the enemy’s defences. Losses were inflicted at two mechanised brigades, one assault brigade,one unmanned aerial systems brigade, and three assault regiments of the AFU near Zarnitsa, Barvinovka, Lyubitskoye, Verkhnyaya Tersa, Dolinka, and Komsomolskoye (Zaporozhye region).

β–ͺ️The enemy lost more than 350 troops, one tank, two armoured fighting vehicles, and 17 motor vehicles.

πŸ”₯Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade and one mountain assault brigade of the AFU near Veselyanka (Zaporozhye region) and Sadovoye (Kherson region).

β–ͺ️Up to 45 troops, eight motor vehicles, and one electronic warfare station were neutralised.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, missile troops and artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have inflicted damage on a Ukrainian military defence enterprise, radar stations, ammunition depots, temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries in 153 areas.

🎯Air defence systems shot down 111 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

πŸ“Š In total, since the beginning of the special military operation the enemy has lost: 

 670 aircraft, 

 283 helicopters, 

 111,517 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

 646 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

 27,379 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

 1,653 MLRS combat vehicles, 

 32,928 field artillery guns and mortars, 

 53,121 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.