July 19, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,175 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

πŸ’₯Last night, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a group strike by long-range air-, ground-, and sea-based precision weapons, strike UAVs at enterprises of the Ukrainian defence industry that produce components of missiles and strike drones.

βœ…All the assigned targets were engaged.

πŸ“Units of the Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade, one air assault brigade, one assault regiment of the AFU close to Varachino, Ryzhevka, Yablonovka, Yunakovka, Alekseyevka, and Kondratovka (Sumy region).

In Kharkov direction, formations of two territorial defence brigades were hit close to Gatishche and Volchansk (Kharkov region).

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to up to 155 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, three motor vehicles, four artillery guns, and one ammunition depot.

πŸ“The Zapad Group’s units improved the situation along the front line and inflicted fire damage on formations of two mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, one airmobile brigade of the AFU, and two territorial defence brigades close to Kupyansk, Sinkovka, Novy Mir (Kharkov region), Koroviy Yar, Karpovka, and Torskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️The enemy losses amounted to more than 230 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, to include one U.S.-made HMMWV armoured fighting vehicle, 18 motor vehicles, and two field artillery guns. One U.S.-made AN/TPQ-50 counter-battery warfare station, two electronic warfare stations, and seven ammunition depots were wiped out.

πŸ“ The Yug Group’s units took more advantageous lines and positions, inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one airmobile brigade of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade near Seversk, Serebryanka, Chasov Yar, Konstantinovka, Kleban Byk, Shcherbinovka, and Belaya Gora (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️The enemy lost up to 125 troops and two artillery guns. One fuel depot and one material depot were destroyed.

πŸ“Units of the Tsentr Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. The Group’s units hit formations of five mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, one jaeger brigade, one airborne brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, two territorial defence brigades, and two national guard brigades near Krasnoarmeysk, Novoukrainka, Muravka, Zverevo, Petrovskogo, and Udachnoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to more than 450 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, 12 motor vehicles, three artillery guns, to include one U.K.-made 155-mm Braveheart self-propelled artillery system.

↗️Units of the Vostok Group of Forces continued advancing into the depth of enemy defences. Manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade, one mountain assault brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, and one territorial defence brigade were hit close to Novogeorgiyevka, Ivanovka (Dnepropetrovsk region), and Zeleny Gai (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to up to 190 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, 11 motor vehicles, one field artillery gun, and one U.S.-made AN/TPQ-36 counter-battery warfare station.

πŸ’₯The Dnepr Group’s units inflicted losses on one mechanised brigade, one mountain assault brigade of the AFU, and two territorial defence brigades near Malaya Tokmachka, Novoandreyevka (Zaporozhye region), Antonovka, and Ponyatovka (Kherson region).

β–ͺ️ More than 45 troops, five motor vehicles, three artillery guns, including one U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzer, three electronic warfare stations, and three ammunition depots were eliminated.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, strike drones, and Missile troops and Artillery of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have inflicted damage on the territorial recruitment centre, infrastructure of the military airfield, aircraft repair enterprise, UAV launch sites as well as temporary deployment areas of the Ukrainian troops in 132 areas.

🎯Air defence systems shot down six guided aerial bombs and 349 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

πŸ“Š In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost: 

πŸ”Ή 664 aircraft, 

πŸ”Ή 283 helicopters, 

πŸ”Ή 70,702 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

πŸ”Ή 619 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

πŸ”Ή 24,259 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles,

πŸ”Ή 1,577 MLRS combat vehicles,

πŸ”Ή 27,576 field artillery guns and mortars,

πŸ”Ή 38,402 special military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.