January 22, 2026

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,240 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 22 January 2026

🪖 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

📍 The Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Manpower and hardware of a mechanised brigade, an assault regiment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and a territorial defence brigade have been hit close to Belopolye, Novaya Sech, and Khoten (Sumy region).

💥 In Kharkov direction, units of two mechanised brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and a territorial defence brigade have been hit close to Volchanskiye Khutora, Zakharovka, and Okhrimovka (Kharkov region).

▪️ The enemy losses amounted to up to 140 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, 15 motor vehicles, a U.S.-made MLRS system, and two 155-mm Bogdana self-propelled artillery systems. Three materiel depots were destroyed.

📍 The Zapad Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Russian troops hit three mechanised brigades, an assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and two national guard brigades near Berezovka, Kovsharovka (Kharkov region), Aleksandrovka, Drobyshevo, and Krasny Liman (Donetsk People’s Republic). 

▪️ The enemy losses amounted to up to 200 troops, five armoured fighting vehicles including a U.S.-made Stryker armoured personnel carrier, 25 motor vehicles, and three artillery guns. Four field ammunition depots were eliminated. 

📍 The Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line. Four mechanised brigades, a motorised infantry brigade, an airmobile brigade, and a mountain assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine have been hit near Berestok, Konstantinovka, Kurtovka, Nikiforovka, Reznikovka, Slavyansk, and Stepanovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 145 troops, a tank, an armoured fighting vehicle, seven motor vehicles, and five field artillery guns including a U.S.-made 155-mm Paladin self-propelled artillery system. Three electronic warfare stations, two ammunition and materiel depots were neutralised.

f the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a marine brigade, a territorial defence brigade, and two national guard brigades near Artemovka, Belitskoye, Grishino, Dobropolye, Novopavlovka, Sukhetskoye, Toretskoye, Udachnoye in the Donetsk People’s Republic, and Novopodgorodnoye in Dnepropetrovsk region.

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 445 troops, two tanks, two armoured fighting vehicles, 10 motor vehicles, three artillery guns, and one electronic warfare station.

↗️ The Vostok Group of Forces continue to advance into the depths of the enemy’s defence. Strikes were delivered against four mechanised brigades, an assault brigade, three assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and a territorial defence brigade near Skotovatoye (Dnepropetrovsk region), Blagodatnoye, Vozdvizhevka, Dolinka, Zalivnoye, Zarnitsa, Komsomolskoye, and Tersyanka (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ The enemy lost up to 250 troops, two armoured personnel carriers, four armoured fighting vehicles, seven motor vehicles, two field artillery guns, and a Grad MLRS system.

💥 The Dnepr Group of Forces units inflicted losses on units of a mountain assault brigade and a coastal defence brigade of the AFU near Magdalinovka and Novoyakovlevka (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ More than 60 troops, five motor vehicles, two electronic warfare stations, a Kupol-M1 radar, a materiel depot were neutralised.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, missile troops and artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have inflicted damage on energy infrastructure facilities used in the interests of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, ammunition depots, temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries in 142 areas.

🎯 Air defence units shot down nine guided aerial bombs and four HIMARS MLRS projectiles, as well as 224 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊  In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost: 

 670 aircraft, 

 283 helicopters, 

 110,748 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

 646 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

 27,267 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

 1,650 MLRS combat vehicles, 

 32,755 field artillery guns and mortars, 

 52,531  units of support wheeled military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.