July 24, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,285 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 24 July 2025

πŸ’₯ Last night, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a group strike with long-range high-precision weapons, as well as with unmanned aerial vehicles against Ukrainian defence industry enterprises and power facilities that support the activities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

βœ… The goal of the strike has been achieved. All the assigned targets have been engaged.

πŸ“ The Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. The Group hit manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade, one air assault brigade, and two assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine close to Radyanskoye, Korchakovka, Khrapovshchina, Maryino, and Ryzhevka (Sumy region).

πŸ’₯ In Kharkov direction, Russian units inflicted fire damage on one mechanised brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade have been hit near Veliky Burluk and Melovoye (Kharkov region).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 160 troops, seven motor vehicles, and five artillery guns. One ammunition depot was wiped out.

πŸ“ The Zapad Group’s units improved the situation along the front line. They hit formations of three mechanised brigade, one assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and a territorial defence brigade close to Sredneye, Karpovka, Shandrigolovo, Drobyshevo (Donetsk People’s Republic) and Andreyevka (Kharkov region).

β–ͺ️ The enemy losses amounted to more than 230 troops, 13 motor vehicles, and one S-60 anti-aircraft gun. Eight ammunition depots were neutralised.

πŸ“ The Yug Group’s units took more advantageous lines and positions, inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one mountain assault brigade, one airmobile brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and one territorial defence brigade near Pleshcheyevka, Seversk, Zvanovka, and Serebryanka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The enemy lost up to 215 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, five motor vehicles, and one artillery gun.

πŸ“ The Tsentr Group’s units improved the tactical situation. Strikes were launched at formations of two mechanised brigades, one airborne brigade, one assault regiment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, one marine brigade, one territorial defence brigade, and one national guard brigade close to Udachnoye, Rodinskoye, Stepanovka, Svetloye, Poltavka, Krasnoarmeysk, and Artema (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The Ukrainian formations lost up to 420 troops, five armoured fighting vehicles, including one U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier, six pickup trucks, and three artillery guns.

wo AFU mechanised brigades and two territorial defence brigades near Novogeorgiyevka (Dnepropetrovsk region), Iskra, Zeleny Gay (Donetsk People’s Republic) and Novoselovka (Zaporozhye region).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 200 troops, one tank, two armoured fighting vehicles, seven motor vehicles, and two artillery guns.

πŸ’₯ Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on units of one mechanised brigade and two territorial defence brigades near Malaya Tokmachka (Zaporozhye region), Antonovka and Belozerka (Kherson region).

β–ͺ️ Up to 60 troops, four motor vehicles, one field artillery gun, two electronic warfare stations, and two ammunition depots were neutralised.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, missile troops, and artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have inflicted damage on UAV assembly and storage facilities, fuel and missile artillery depots, as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian troops, nationalists, and foreign mercenaries in 136 areas.

🎯 Air defence systems shot down six guided aerial bombs, one Neptune long-range missile, as well as 217 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

πŸ“Š In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost

πŸ”Ή 664 aircraft, 

πŸ”Ή 283 helicopters, 

πŸ”Ή 72,195 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

πŸ”Ή 623 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

πŸ”Ή 24,316 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicle, 

πŸ”Ή 1,581 MLRS combat vehicles, 

πŸ”Ή 27,780 field artillery guns and mortars, 

πŸ”Ή 38,645 special military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.