February 5, 2026

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,305 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

πŸŽ–πŸŽ– Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 5 February 2026

▫️ The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

πŸ“The Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Russian troops inflicted damage on the units of one mechanised brigade, one assault regiment of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade close to Pokrovka, Novaya Sech, Khoten, Mogritsa, and Miropolye in Sumy region.

πŸ’₯In Kharkov direction, units of one mechanised brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade were hit near Chugunovka and Grafskoye in Kharkov region.

β–ͺ️The enemy lost more than 280 troops, 10 motor vehicles, one artillery gun, and two electronic warfare stations. One materiel depot was destroyed.

πŸ“The Zapad Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Strikes were delivered at manpower and hardware of three mechanised brigades, one assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and one national guard brigade near Kovsharovka, Novoosinovo, Borovaya, Novoyegorovka, Studenok, Novoplatonovka in Kharkov region, Krasny Liman, Sosnovoye, and Drobyshevo in the Donetsk People’s Republic.

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to up to 180 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, 16 motor vehicles, four field artillery guns, and one Grad MLRS combat vehicle. Five ammunition depots were destroyed.

πŸ“The Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line. Russian troops inflicted losses at one mechanised brigade, one motorised infantry brigade, one mountain assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and one territorial defence brigade near Reznikovka, Konstantinovka, Krivaya Luka, Krasnotorka, Kaleniki, Privolye, Kramatorsk, and Petrovskoye in the Donetsk People’s Republic.

β–ͺ️The enemy losses amounted to up to 125 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, nine motor vehicles, four field artillery guns, and one counter-fire radar station. One materiel depot was destroyed.

πŸ“The Tsentr Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. The Group’s units inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of three mechanised brigades, one infantry brigade, one assault regiment of the AFU, and one national guard brigade close to Novovodyanoye, Grishino, Novy Donbass, Belitskoye, Shevchenko, Toretskoye, Kucherov Yar in the Donetsk People’s Republic, and Novopavlovka in Dnepropetrovsk region.

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to more than 310 troops, one tank, five armoured fighting vehicles, 11 motor vehicles, two artillery guns, including one U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzer, and one counter-fire radar station.

πŸŽ–πŸŽ– by Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 5 February 2026

Part 2 (πŸ‘‰ see Part 1)

↗️The Vostok Group of Forces continued advancing into the depth of enemy defence. Russian troops inflicted losses on the formations of mechanised brigade, one air assault brigade, and two assault regiments of the AFU near Lyubitskoye, Rovnoye, Verkhnyaya Tersa, Krinichnoye, Komsomolskoye, Charivnoye, Rizdvyanka in Zaporozhye region, and Pokrovskoye in Dnepropetrovsk region.

β–ͺ️The enemy lost more than 360 troops, one tank, seven armoured fighting vehicles, 10 motor vehicles, and one field artillery gun. One materiel depot was destroyed.

πŸ’₯ The Dnepr Group’s units inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade and one mountain assault brigade of the AFU near Magdalinovka, Novodanilovka, Shcherbaki (Zaporozhye region), and Berislav (Kherson region).

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to up to 50 troops, 16 motor vehicles, three field artillery guns, including one U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzer, one Buk anti-aircraft missile launcher, three electronic warfare stations, and two counter-fire stations. One materiel depot was destroyed.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, missile troops and artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces inflicted damage on the transport and energy infrastructure used in the interests of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, assembly, storage and launch areas of long-range unmanned aerial vehicles, ammunition depots, temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries in 148 areas.

▫️Air defence systems shot down one guided aerial bomb, nine HIMARS MLRS projectiles, and 381 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

πŸ“Š In total, since the beginning of the special military operation the enemy has lost: 

 670 aircraft, 

 283 helicopters, 

 112,596 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

 650 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

 27,503 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

 1,659 MLRS combat vehicles, 

 33,080 field artillery guns and mortars, 

 53,713 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.