July 8, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense:  Up to 1,305 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

🪖 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

📍 Units of the Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation in Sumy region. Russian troops inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of a tank brigade, one mechanised brigade, two air assault brigades, one air assault regiment, and one assault regiment close to Novoivanovka, Novaya Sech, Kondratovka, Yunakovka, Sadki, and Varachino (Sumy region).

💥 In Kharkov direction, Russian troops hit formations of one motorised infantry brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade near Maly Burluk, Gatishche, and Volchansk (Kharkov region).

▪️ The AFU losses were up to 185 troops, seven motor vehicles, five field artillery, one ammunition depot, and one electronic warfare station.

📍 The Zapad Group of Forces’ units improved the tactical situation along the front line. Russian troops launched attacks on three mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, and one territorial defence brigade close to Petro-Ivanovka, Kupyansk (Kharkov region), Sredneye, Zelenaya Dolina, and Torskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses were over 205 troops and one U.S.-made HMMWV armoured fighting vehicle. In addition, 28 motor vehicles, one 155-mm Polish-made Krab self-propelled artillery system, three electronic warfare stations, and five ammunition depots were destroyed.

📍 Units of the Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Russian troops inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of three mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, one mountain assault brigade of the AFU, one territorial defence brigade, and one National Guard brigade near Zvanovka, Katerinovka, Serebryanka, Seversk, Chasov Yar, Belaya Gora, Konstantinovka, Shcherbinovka, and Aleksandro-Shultino (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The enemy losses were more than 190 troops, one U.S.-made HMMWV armoured fighting vehicle, five pickup trucks, three artillery guns, three ammunition depots, and one electronic warfare station.

▪️ The AFU losses were over 430 soldiers, nine motor vehicles, and two field artillery guns.

📍 Units of the Vostok Group of Forces continued advancing into the depth of enemy defences. Russian troops launched attacks on two mechanised brigades of the AFU and three territorial defence brigades near Voskresenka, Karla Marksa (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses were up to 215 troops, one tank, three armoured fighting vehicles, 15 motor vehicles, and two artillery guns.

🔥 Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on two mechanised brigades, one mountain assault brigade, two coastal defence brigades of the AFU, and two territorial defence brigades close to Orekhov, Novoandreyevka, Kamenskoye, Novodanilovka (Zaporozhye region), Sadovoye, and Antonovka (Kherson region).

▪️ The AFU losses were up to 80 troops of the AFU, eight motor vehicles, three field artillery guns, eight electronic warfare stations, and six ammunition depots.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, missile troops, and artillery of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation inflicted damage on gas and power infrastructure facilities that support the work of Ukrainian defence industry enterprises as well as the temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian troops and foreign mercenaries in 133 areas.

🎯 Air defence systems shot down four guided bombs, U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles, and 202 U.S.-made unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊  In total, since the beginning of the special military operation the AFU lost: 

 663 aircraft,

 283 helicopters, 

 68,251 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

 614 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

 24,162 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

 1,576 MLRS combat vehicles, 

 27,129 field artillery guns and mortars,

 37,832 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.