July 30, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,310 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 30 July 2025

πŸͺ– The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

πŸ“ The Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. The Russian Armed Forces inflicted losses on the manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one air assault brigade and two assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Proletarskoye, Yunakovka, and Andreyevka (Sumy region).

πŸ’₯ In Kharkov direction, Russian units hit one mechanised brigade, one tank brigade, and one assault regiment of the AFU near Melovoye and Volchanskiye Khutora (Kharkov region).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 190 troops, one tank, one armoured fighting vehicle, two motor vehicles, and one artillery gun. An electronic warfare station and three ammunition depots and four materiel depots of the enemy were neutralised.

πŸ“ The Zapad Group’s units improved the situation along the front line. They hit units of one mechanised brigade and one assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Osinovo (Kharkov region) and Shandrigolovo (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The enemy losses were over 245 servicemen, two armoured fighting vehicles, and 12 motor vehicles. Three electronic warfare stations and eight ammunition depots were destroyed.

πŸ“ The Yug Group’s elements took more advantageous lines and positions. They inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of four AFU mechanised brigades, one National Guard brigade near Konstantinovka, Ivanopolye, Vasyukovka, and Dzerzhinsk (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 200 troops, six motor vehicles, two Western-made artillery guns, one electronic warfare station, and one counter-fire radar station. Two ammunition depots and three materiel depots were eliminated.

πŸ“ The Tsentr Group’s units improved the tactical situation. The Russian units defeated the units of three mechanised brigades, one air assault brigade, one assault bridge, one infantry brigade, one assault regiment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and one territorial defence brigade near Vladimirovka, Krasnoarmeysk, and Sukhetskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 410 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, five motor vehicles, one Czech-made Vampire MLRS, three artillery guns, and a counter-fire radar station.

netsk People’s Republic), Voronoye, Yanvarskoye, and Novopetrovskoye (Dnepropetrovsk region).

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 210 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, ten motor vehicles, and a Western-made artillery gun. Two ammunition depots and a materiel depot were eliminated.

πŸ’₯ Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of one mechanised brigade, one mountain assault brigade, one coastal defence brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, three territorial defence brigades, and one national guard brigade close to Belogorye, Novoandreyevka, Veselyanka, Grigorovka, Orekhov (Zaporozhye region), Olgovka, and Antonovka (Kherson region).

β–ͺ️The AFU losses amounted to up to 55 troops, two motor vehicles, one artillery gun, four electronic warfare stations, and two counter-fire radar stations. Two ammunition depots and five materiel depots were eliminated.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, strike drones, missile troops, and artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have engaged the transport infrastructure used for the AFU, a depot of robotics systems, temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian forces and foreign mercenaries in 156 areas.

🎯 Air defence systems shot down two guided aerial bombs and 133 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

πŸ“Š In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost:

πŸ”Ή 664 aircraft,

πŸ”Ή 283 helicopters,

πŸ”Ή 73,522 unmanned aerial vehicles,

πŸ”Ή 624 anti-aircraft missile systems,

πŸ”Ή 24,384 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles,

πŸ”Ή 1,584 MLRS combat vehicles,

πŸ”Ή 27,956 field artillery guns and mortars,

πŸ”Ή 38,892 special military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.