June 28, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense:  up to 1,350 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 28 June 2025

🪖 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

📍 Units of the Sever Group of Forces improved the situation along the front line. Russian troops hit three mechanised brigades, an assault regiment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and a territorial defence brigade have been hit near Andreyevka, Kondratovka, Mogritsa, and Marino (Sumy region).

💥 In Kharkov direction, units of a mechanised brigade of the AFU and a territorial defence brigade have been hit near Udy and Volchansk (Kharkov region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 155 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, five motor vehicles, three field artillery guns, and an ammunition depot.

📍Units of the Zapad Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Russian elements damaged two mechanised brigades, an airmobile brigade, two assault brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and a territorial defence brigade near Kupyansk, Olgovka, Sobolevka, Senkovo (Kharkov region), and Karpovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 230 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles including a U.S.-made HMMWV armoured vehicle, a UK-made Snatch armoured fighting vehicle, six motor vehicles, and three artillery guns. One electronic warfare station and three ammunition depots have been destroyed.

↗️ Units of the Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line. Russian troops engaged three mechanised brigades, an airmobile brigade, an assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and a territorial defence brigade near Seversk, Reznikova, Zvanovka, Pleshcheyevka, Ivanovopole, and Konstantinovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The enemy lost up to 175 troops, two pickup trucks, and a field artillery gun.

📍 Units of the Tsentr Group of Forces continued advancing into the depth of enemy defence. Two mechanised brigades, an assault brigade, an air assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a marine brigade, a territorial defence brigade, and a national guard brigade have been defeated near Popov Yar, Novoekonomicheskoye, Krasnoarmeysk, Petrovsky, Dimitrov, Mayak, and Muravka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 505 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles including a U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier, two motor vehicles, and two field artillery guns.

avka, Malinovka (Zaporozhye region), and Kamyshevakha (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️The AFU losses amounted to up to 210 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, eight motor vehicles, three artillery guns, and an electronic warfare station.

💥 The Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on units of a mechanised brigade, a coastal defence brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and a territorial defence brigade near Kamenskoye (Zaporozhye region), Antonovka, Kazatskoye, and Novotyaginka (Kherson region).

▪️Up to 75 troops, four motor vehicles, two field artillery guns, three electronic warfare stations, and two ammunition depots have been neutralised.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, missile troops, and artillery of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have inflicted damage on ammunition and material depots, long-range strike drones manufacturing shop, stoking sites of uncrewed surface vehicles, and temporary deployment areas of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and foreign mercenaries in 142 areas.

🎯 Air defence systems shot down six guided aerial bombs and 252 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation the enemy lost: 

🔹 663 aircraft, 

🔹 283 helicopters, 

🔹 66,058 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

🔹 612 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

🔹 24,069 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

🔹 1,572 MLRS combat vehicles, 

🔹 26,719 field artillery guns and mortars, 

🔹 37,392 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.