December 29, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,385 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 29 December 2025

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

📍 Units of the Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation and inflicted fire damage on formations of two mechanised brigades, one jaeger brigade, and one assault regiment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Ryzhevka, Andreyevka, Alekseyevka, and Varachino (Sumy region).

💥 In Kharkov direction, Russian troops hit units of the one mechanised brigade and one motorised infantry brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Grafskoye, Rubezhnoye, and Staritsa (Kharkov region).

▪️ The AFU losses were up to 205 troops, nine motor vehicles, one self-propelled artillery system, and one electronic warfare station.

🚩 The Zapad Group of Forces’ units completed the liberation of Dibrova (Donetsk People’s Republic).

💥 Russian troops inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of three mechanised brigades, one assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, one National Guard brigade, and one territorial defence brigade near Kupyansk-Uzlovoy, Podoly, Glushkovka (Kharkov region), Drobyshevo, Krasny Liman, and Ilyichevka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

🪖 In Kupyansk direction, units of the 6th Army repelled two attacks launched by units of the 144th Mechanised Brigade and the 92nd Assault Brigade of the AFU including foreign mercenaries that tried to break into Kupyansk (Kharkov region) near Palamarevka and Blagodatovka. In addition, 26 troops and 17 pieces of military hardware were neutralised.

▪️ In the area of responsibility of the Zapad Group of Forces, the AFU losses were more than 210 troops, five armoured fighting vehicles including one M113 armoured personnel carrier two U.S.-made HMMWV armoured vehicles, one Italian-made Iveco armoured vehicle, and one Canadian-made Senator armoured personnel carrier. In addition, 21 pickup trucks and five ammunition depots were neutralised

📍 Units of the Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Russian troops delivereed strikes at formations if three mechanised brigades, one mountain assault brigade, one airmobile brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and one territorial defence brigade near Cherevkovka, Alekseyevo-Druzhkovka, Dolgaya Balka, Reznikovka, and Slavyansk (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The enemy losses were up to 205 troops, five armoured fighting vehicles including one M113 armoured personnel carrier, one U.S.-made Hummer armoured vehicle, eight motor vehicles, four field artillery guns including three NATO-made ones.

▪️ In addition, two electronic warfare stations, one U.S.-made AN/TPQ-50 counter-battery warfare station, and two materiel depots were neutralised.

rigade near Gavrilovka, Krutoyarovka, Novopavlovka (Dnepropetrovsk region), Toretskoye, Svetloye, Grishino, Shevchenko, Shilovka, Belitskoye, Vodyanskoye, Dobropolye, and Novy Donbass (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The enemy losses were over 495 troops.

↗️ The Vostok Group of Forces’ units continued to advance into the depths of enemy defences. Russian troops inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, two assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and two territorial defence brigades close to Bratskoye, Velikomikhaylovka (Dnepropetrovsk region), Boykovo, Ternovatoye, and Zaliznichnoye (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ The AFU losses were up to 190 troops, one armoured personnel carrier, and 16 motor vehicles.

📍 Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Russian troops hit units of one mountain assault brigade and one territorial defence brigade near Orekhov, Novoandreyevka, Lukyanovskoye (Zaporozhye region), and Sadovoye (Kherson region).

▪️ The AFU losses were more than 55 Ukrainian troops, nine motor vehicles, two electronic warfare stations, and one materiel depot.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered strikes at temporary deployment areas of the AFU and foreign mercenaries in 153 areas.

🎯 Air defence systems shot down two Grom operational-tactical missiles and 140 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊  In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost: 

 669 aircraft, 

 283 helicopters, 

 105,805 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

 641 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

 26,775 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

 1,634 MLRS combat vehicles, 

 32,240 field artillery guns and mortars, 

 50,291 support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.