January 22, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,390 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry reports on the progress of the special military operation (20 January 2025)

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

▫️ In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces hit formations of one AFU motorised infantry brigade close to Volchansk (Kharkov region).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 20 troops, two motor vehicles, and one electronic warfare station.

▫️As a result of offensive actions, units of the Zapad Group of Forces have liberated Novoyegorovka (Lugansk People’s Republic).

Two mechanised brigades and one infantry brigade of the AFU suffered losses near Ivanovka, Yampol, and Seversk (Donetsk People’s Republic).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 400 troops, one U.S.-made Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, one U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier, three armoured fighting vehicles, seven motor vehicles, and five field artillery guns. One field ammunition depot was destroyed.

▫️The Yug Group of Forces’ units took more advantageous lines and positions, defeated formations of three mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, and two assault brigades of the AFU close to Dachnoye, Fyodorovka, Podolskoye, Nikolayevka, and Mayskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

The AFU losses amounted to more than 220 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, and one motor vehicle. Four AFU field ammunition depots were destroyed. 

▫️The Tsentr Group of Forces’ units have continued advancing into the depths of the enemy’s defence and liberated Shevchenko (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Strikes were delivered at manpower and hardware of five mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, and two national guard brigades close to Petrovka, Dzerzhinsk, Novoyelizavetovka, Novovasilevka, Lysovka, and Slavyanka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 545 troops, two U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carriers, three motor vehicles, and one 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system.

▫️The Vostok Group of Forces’ units advanced into the depths of the enemy’s defence, defeated units of two mechanised brigades of the AFU, one marine brigade, and two territorial defence brigades close to Konstantinopol, Novy Komar, Bogatyr (Donetsk People’s Republic), Gulyai Pole, and Novodarovka (Zaporozhye region).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 140 troops, one tank, one armoured fighting vehicle, one motor vehicle, and two French-made Caesar self-propelled artillery systems.

▫️The Dnepr Group of Forces’ units have engaged manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, and one territorial defence brigade near Tokarevka, Antonovka, Daryevka (Kherson region), and Kamenskoye (Zaporozhye region).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 65 troops, six motor vehicles, and one field artillery gun. One electronic warfare station and one ammunition depot have been neutralised.

▫️Operational-Tactical Aviation, strike unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have engaged the infrastructure of military airfields, UAV workshops and depots, as well as clusters of enemy manpower and hardware in 152 areas.

▫️Air defence systems shot down one French-made Hammer guided aerial bomb, eight U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles, and 86 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

▫️In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, 652 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 40,878 unmanned aerial vehicles, 590 anti-aircraft missile systems, 20,684 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 1,510 MLRS combat vehicles, 20,809 field artillery guns and mortars, and 30,501 units of support military vehicles have been neutralised.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.